Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.help > #980
| From | blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.help |
| Subject | Re: How far back can we go? |
| Date | 2011-08-29 16:03 +0000 |
| Organization | None |
| Message-ID | <9c1rhlFn25U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <4e58a696$0$828$e4fe514c@dreader28.news.xs4all.nl> <1351725e-58c3-4395-b93d-ff0ab9264945@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com> <9c1do9F1tcU1@mid.individual.net> <c4237952-f387-4773-acc3-45e7317c3bd2@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com> |
In article <c4237952-f387-4773-acc3-45e7317c3bd2@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com>, Lew <comp.lang.java.help@googlegroups.com> wrote: > blmblm @ myrealbox. com wrote: > > Lew wrote: > >> If the books were good, they've been updated and you can use the new > >> editions. > > > > I'm far from convinced that the correlation between quality and > > updates is as strong as you seem to be saying it is. It seems to > > me that whether a book gets updated depends not so much on quality > > as on whether the author is interested in doing an update and the > > publisher is interested in publishing it. ? > > > > [ snip ] > > Fair enough, but if the book hasn't been updated to at least Java > 5 then its quality, which I define as usefulness to someone > wanting to program in Java today, is near nil. Agreed. > So our disagreement rests on the definition of "quality". It may > have been a great book in its day, but if that day doesn't help > this day then it's no longer a great book by the pragmatic > definition of, "What has it done for me lately?" Well, no, with all due respect I don't think that's at all the point I was trying to make. You said "if the books *were* [emphasis mine] good, they've been updated", and that's what I'm skeptical about -- whether a lack of updates necessarily indicates that the book wasn't very good to begin with. > The fact remains that books teaching pre-1.5 Java will cause > difficulties for someone learning the language now. That's just > not "quality" enough. Agreed. -- B. L. Massingill ObDisclaimer: I don't speak for my employers; they return the favor.
Back to comp.lang.java.help | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
How far back can we go? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201108.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2011-08-27 08:15 +0200
Re: How far back can we go? jaap <niemand@meel.homelinux.net> - 2011-08-27 10:11 +0200
Re: How far back can we go? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-27 01:29 -0700
Re: How far back can we go? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201108.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2011-08-28 07:46 +0200
Re: How far back can we go? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-28 02:17 -0700
Re: How far back can we go? blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2011-08-29 12:07 +0000
Re: How far back can we go? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-29 08:25 -0700
Re: How far back can we go? blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2011-08-29 16:03 +0000
Re: How far back can we go? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-29 09:19 -0700
Re: How far back can we go? blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2011-08-30 14:28 +0000
Re: How far back can we go? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-08-29 04:16 -0700
Re: How far back can we go? Steve <tinker123@gmail.com> - 2011-08-29 10:03 -0400
Re: How far back can we go? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-08-29 14:06 -0700
Re: How far back can we go? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-29 14:30 -0700
Re: How far back can we go? Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-08-30 08:28 -0500
Re: How far back can we go? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201108.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2011-08-31 06:44 +0200
Re: How far back can we go? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-30 22:21 -0700
Re: How far back can we go? Steve <tinker123@gmail.com> - 2011-08-30 10:51 -0400
Re: How far back can we go? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-30 09:30 -0700
Re: How far back can we go? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201108.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2011-08-30 01:48 +0200
Re: How far back can we go? markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-29 18:53 -0700
Re: How far back can we go? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-29 19:06 -0700
Re: How far back can we go? markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-29 20:05 -0700
csiph-web