Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.gui > #5543
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | "Jeffrey H. Coffield" <jeffrey@digitalsynergyinc.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.gui |
| Subject | Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? |
| Date | Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:22:34 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 30 |
| Message-ID | <rgemcc$pb6$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <rgbm3r$fml$1@news.icm.edu.pl> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Wed, 5 Aug 2020 16:22:36 -0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="d1c689c79f86230f7515f5212e47e612"; logging-data="25958"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/0diRRkPeowOqG6ZKOS2OjfZLOdW/XKWw=" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:8A6aG+1U6JehC/aME/whymTrj44= |
| In-Reply-To | <rgbm3r$fml$1@news.icm.edu.pl> |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.gui:5543 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 08/04/2020 05:59 AM, slawek wrote: > > Is JavaFx better (i.e. simpler, cleaner, more easy, more > productive) than Swing? > > Where is ready-to-use SDK with ver > x.x.2 ? > > BTW, Gluon offers only "trial demo" (up to 2 patches, alike Oracle > JDK mambo-jambo with free-but-monetized licensing > scheme). > JavaFX is far superior to Swing because of all the experience* the developers of Swing gained. In particular, JavaFX has built in properties where Swing had many attempts at "beans-binding" that never completely worked. You will want to get SceneBuilder to edit fxml files and start with a JavaFX FXML application. Java 8 included FX support but after that you have to download a separate jar and also contend with the "new features**" of Maven or Gradle. Jeff *(Good judgement comes from experience, experience comes from bad-judgement) **(Oh crap! They figured out how to use the software. Time for a rewrite.)
Back to comp.lang.java.gui | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Is JavaFx better than Swing? slawek <x.y@org.org> - 2020-08-04 14:59 +0200
Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? "Jeffrey H. Coffield" <jeffrey@digitalsynergyinc.com> - 2020-08-05 09:22 -0700
Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? slawek <x.y@org.org> - 2020-08-06 20:15 +0200
Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2020-08-07 01:42 +0200
Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? slawek <x.y@org.org> - 2020-08-07 10:52 +0200
Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2020-08-08 02:47 +0200
Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? slawek <x.y@org.org> - 2020-08-11 10:00 +0200
Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2020-08-11 12:33 +0200
Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg@example.net> - 2020-10-22 22:10 +0100
Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? slawek <x.y@org.org> - 2020-10-26 07:39 +0100
Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? James Shisia <jamesshisia6@gmail.com> - 2022-08-23 05:48 -0700
Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? "Jeffrey H. Coffield" <jeffrey@digitalsynergyinc.com> - 2020-08-08 09:43 -0700
Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? slawek <x.y@org.org> - 2020-08-11 10:13 +0200
Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? "Jeffrey H. Coffield" <jeffrey@digitalsynergyinc.com> - 2020-08-15 09:26 -0700
Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? slawek <x.y@org.org> - 2020-08-20 14:37 +0200
Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg@example.net> - 2020-10-22 21:09 +0100
Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg@example.net> - 2020-10-22 21:46 +0100
csiph-web