Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.gui > #5544
| From | slawek <x.y@org.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.gui |
| Subject | Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? |
| Date | 2020-08-06 20:15 +0200 |
| Organization | news.icm.edu.pl |
| Message-ID | <rghhba$i0r$1@news.icm.edu.pl> (permalink) |
| References | <rgbm3r$fml$1@news.icm.edu.pl> <rgemcc$pb6$1@dont-email.me> |
"Jeffrey H. Coffield" <jeffrey@digitalsynergyinc.com> Wrote in message: > Java 8 included FX support but after that you have to download a separate jar and also contend with the "new features**" of Maven or Gradle. I have summarize my "research". 1. It is not possible use Ant. I must use a mambo-jambo (a new language for Gradle, new tools and mabye sign in to some repos/services) AND again learn n-th time how to write "Hello world" (no more EDT, a rather stupid assumption that the app == window, dozen objects before a single window will be created, no chance to migrate with existing code). 2. Apache Netbeans+JDK8+JavaFx - no fun - the Fx examples does not work at all. 3. There is no good tutorials on JavaFx. Most tutorials is on old versions like 9. 4. The vendor lock - the only free avaliable versions are buggy - for example 11.0.2 is buggy, the updated 11.x.x are non-free (no avaliable compiled libs). 5. And last but also important - there is exactly one entusiast of JavaFx - You. Nobody else answered on pros Fx. Actually Swing is rather... mature... old... maybe obsolete. But usefull. Java Fx is like BR discs - superior but useless. (Yep, I have a BR drives/recorders etc. But - with the 8K, fibers, terabyte pendrives - I don't use Bluray anymore.) ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
Back to comp.lang.java.gui | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Is JavaFx better than Swing? slawek <x.y@org.org> - 2020-08-04 14:59 +0200
Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? "Jeffrey H. Coffield" <jeffrey@digitalsynergyinc.com> - 2020-08-05 09:22 -0700
Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? slawek <x.y@org.org> - 2020-08-06 20:15 +0200
Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2020-08-07 01:42 +0200
Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? slawek <x.y@org.org> - 2020-08-07 10:52 +0200
Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2020-08-08 02:47 +0200
Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? slawek <x.y@org.org> - 2020-08-11 10:00 +0200
Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2020-08-11 12:33 +0200
Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg@example.net> - 2020-10-22 22:10 +0100
Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? slawek <x.y@org.org> - 2020-10-26 07:39 +0100
Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? James Shisia <jamesshisia6@gmail.com> - 2022-08-23 05:48 -0700
Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? "Jeffrey H. Coffield" <jeffrey@digitalsynergyinc.com> - 2020-08-08 09:43 -0700
Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? slawek <x.y@org.org> - 2020-08-11 10:13 +0200
Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? "Jeffrey H. Coffield" <jeffrey@digitalsynergyinc.com> - 2020-08-15 09:26 -0700
Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? slawek <x.y@org.org> - 2020-08-20 14:37 +0200
Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg@example.net> - 2020-10-22 21:09 +0100
Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg@example.net> - 2020-10-22 21:46 +0100
csiph-web