Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.gui > #5553

Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing?

From slawek <x.y@org.org>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.gui
Subject Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing?
Date 2020-08-20 14:37 +0200
Organization news.icm.edu.pl
Message-ID <rhlqpt$spn$1@news.icm.edu.pl> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <rgi4h1$5q9$1@dont-email.me> <rgj4or$uui$1@news.icm.edu.pl> <rgmkmm$9r2$1@dont-email.me> <rgtjv2$b3g$2@news.icm.edu.pl> <rh92c6$pge$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


"Jeffrey H. Coffield" <jeffrey@digitalsynergyinc.com> Wrote in message:
> I found this yesterday, loaded on a Raspberry PI 2 and ran a full JavaFX program developed under Java 8 with no special setup after the installation.

Nice. My app, C (without ++) and Win API, for Windows 95 run
 flawlessly under Windows 10 (and 8.1, 7, Vista, XP) and also
 Linux (Wine). Rasbian is Linux. Therefore it should works even on
 Raspberry (Zero?).

Anyway I suppose that Swing has no problem on Raspberry.

The problem may be with license, RP may be treated as an
 non-general computing env. OpenJDK don't have JavaFx. Classical
 FUD. And - THIS IS THE MAIN TROUBLE - only beta versions (x.0,
 x.1, x.2) are free and public - patched bugfree JavaFx versions
 are behind a paywall. The real pain is that nobody can use
 unpatched libs and honestly declare best practices.

Even more. Raspberry is really fun and exciting. But you have no
 chance to produce/sell anything with Raspberry embeded. You can't
 use it for example to produce 1000000 inteligent door bells...
 Also BT in Raspberry (Raspberry as a part) is without - AFAK - a
 valid SIG license: Raspberry is conformant, but your product need
 separate SIG license anyway. It has no effect for hobbysts or
 during R&D. But it is very important for any commercial use (like
 door bells mass production).


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

Back to comp.lang.java.gui | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Is JavaFx better than Swing? slawek <x.y@org.org> - 2020-08-04 14:59 +0200
  Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? "Jeffrey H. Coffield" <jeffrey@digitalsynergyinc.com> - 2020-08-05 09:22 -0700
    Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? slawek <x.y@org.org> - 2020-08-06 20:15 +0200
      Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2020-08-07 01:42 +0200
        Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? slawek <x.y@org.org> - 2020-08-07 10:52 +0200
          Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2020-08-08 02:47 +0200
            Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? slawek <x.y@org.org> - 2020-08-11 10:00 +0200
              Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2020-08-11 12:33 +0200
                Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg@example.net> - 2020-10-22 22:10 +0100
                Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? slawek <x.y@org.org> - 2020-10-26 07:39 +0100
                Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? James Shisia <jamesshisia6@gmail.com> - 2022-08-23 05:48 -0700
          Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? "Jeffrey H. Coffield" <jeffrey@digitalsynergyinc.com> - 2020-08-08 09:43 -0700
            Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? slawek <x.y@org.org> - 2020-08-11 10:13 +0200
              Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? "Jeffrey H. Coffield" <jeffrey@digitalsynergyinc.com> - 2020-08-15 09:26 -0700
                Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? slawek <x.y@org.org> - 2020-08-20 14:37 +0200
    Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg@example.net> - 2020-10-22 21:09 +0100
      Re: Is JavaFx better than Swing? Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg@example.net> - 2020-10-22 21:46 +0100

csiph-web