Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #22079
| From | Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. |
| Date | 2013-04-30 18:40 +0200 |
| Organization | 1&1 Internet AG |
| Message-ID | <klos6f$teo$1@online.de> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <7xy5c0czee.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <JuWdnd22cdSQ4uLMnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@supernews.com> <7xhaio5rbx.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <517f882f$0$6075$e4fe514c@dreader36.news.xs4all.nl> <lb6dnbbrO9jOFuLMnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@supernews.com> |
Andrew Haley wrote: > Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> wrote: >> Because the meta compilers themselves are never portable. > > They're as portable as they need to be. There's nothing at all to > prevent one from being written in standard Forth. It's just > generating a bunch of bytes, after all. Most people don't bother > because they're targeting Forth X from Forth X. Gforth's cross compiler at one time did run on bigForth, iForth, and Gforth. We don't test that, so maybe it isn't portable anymore. But it once was. > In which case I'd like to see someone defend it. For bootstrapping > it's perefectly reasonable, but after that, no. It's not too difficult to find a working Forth today, so for bootstrapping, a cross compiler written in ANS Forth is "good enough". IMHO the reasons why newbies find assembler listings attractive is that you "bootstrap" the newbies. You start with something they understand (the assembler), and then bottom-up explain them how other things work. -- Bernd Paysan "If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself" http://bernd-paysan.de/
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
The most elegant Forth interpreter. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-04-27 09:13 +0000
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-27 22:46 -0700
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-04-28 03:37 -0500
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-04-28 12:58 +0000
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-04-28 17:00 -0500
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-28 18:26 -0700
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-04-29 03:28 -0500
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-29 01:38 -0700
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-29 01:43 -0700
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-04-29 04:01 -0500
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-10 21:20 -0700
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-11 02:03 -0500
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. David Schultz <abuse@127.0.0.1> - 2013-05-11 11:01 -0500
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. David Schultz <abuse@127.0.0.1> - 2013-05-11 15:53 -0500
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-11 20:59 -0700
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-12 02:40 -0500
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-12 22:12 -0700
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-13 02:26 -0500
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-13 03:46 -0500
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. David Schultz <abuse@127.0.0.1> - 2013-05-12 07:53 -0500
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-05-12 20:15 -0700
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-12 21:43 -0700
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-04-29 08:07 -1000
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-04-29 20:55 +0200
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-04-29 16:28 -0500
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-04-29 23:35 +0200
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-04-29 17:28 -0500
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-29 23:20 -0700
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-04-29 21:11 -1000
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-04-30 03:21 -0500
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-30 01:57 -0700
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-04-30 09:00 +0000
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-30 02:10 -0700
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-04-30 14:34 +0000
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-04-30 17:18 +0200
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-30 10:04 -0700
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-04-30 04:13 -0500
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-04-30 18:40 +0200
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-04-30 12:50 -0500
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-03 22:01 -0700
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-04-30 04:09 -0500
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-06 19:29 -0700
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Elizabeth D Rather <erather@forth.com> - 2013-04-29 12:35 -1000
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-04-30 01:50 +0200
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-04-29 13:55 -1000
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-04-30 09:03 +0000
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-04-29 10:32 +0000
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-29 08:34 -0700
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-04-29 17:31 -0400
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-04-29 17:56 -0500
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. lynx <rinkasu@kaze.void.null> - 2013-04-29 22:38 +0000
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-04-29 12:31 +1000
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Spam@ControlQ.com - 2013-04-29 13:31 -0400
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. jlarsonfour3@gmail.com - 2013-04-29 08:14 -0700
Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-04-29 10:28 -0700
csiph-web