Groups > comp.lang.forth > #22065

Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter.

From	Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.forth
Subject	Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter.
Date	2013-04-30 01:57 -0700
Organization	Nightsong/Fort GNOX
Message-ID	<7xhaio5rbx.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> (permalink)
References	(9 earlier) <dv-dnWXUAepheOPMnZ2dnUVZ_sWdnZ2d@supernews.com> <klmp3i$haf$1@online.de> <eMidnYYBW6WUaePMnZ2dnUVZ_rudnZ2d@supernews.com> <7xy5c0czee.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <JuWdnd22cdSQ4uLMnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@supernews.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> writes:
>>>> Also, porting to another architecture isn't possible with this
>>>> approach.
>>> Well, yes.  To cross-compile[r] you need a cross-compiler.
>> I don't understand the obstacle.  Can't you ...
> You seem to have described a cross-compiler.

In this case I don't understand the objection "porting to another
architecture isn't possible with this approach".  It's the same approach
except the way I described it, there were temporarily two assemblers in
the system.  But another moment of thought indicates (again unless I
miss something) that only the target assembler is needed.  The origin
assembler only has to be in the executable that you start with.  You
don't have to run the final executable on the origin system.

Anyway the scheme is fiendishly clever but relatively uncomplicated once
understood.  Now I wonder why eforth didn't use it.

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

The most elegant Forth interpreter. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-04-27 09:13 +0000
  Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-27 22:46 -0700
    Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-04-28 03:37 -0500
      Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-04-28 12:58 +0000
        Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-04-28 17:00 -0500
          Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-28 18:26 -0700
            Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-04-29 03:28 -0500
              Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-29 01:38 -0700
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-29 01:43 -0700
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-04-29 04:01 -0500
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-10 21:20 -0700
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-11 02:03 -0500
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. David Schultz <abuse@127.0.0.1> - 2013-05-11 11:01 -0500
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. David Schultz <abuse@127.0.0.1> - 2013-05-11 15:53 -0500
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-11 20:59 -0700
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-12 02:40 -0500
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-12 22:12 -0700
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-13 02:26 -0500
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-13 03:46 -0500
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. David Schultz <abuse@127.0.0.1> - 2013-05-12 07:53 -0500
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-05-12 20:15 -0700
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-12 21:43 -0700
              Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-04-29 08:07 -1000
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-04-29 20:55 +0200
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-04-29 16:28 -0500
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-04-29 23:35 +0200
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-04-29 17:28 -0500
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-29 23:20 -0700
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-04-29 21:11 -1000
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-04-30 03:21 -0500
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-30 01:57 -0700
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-04-30 09:00 +0000
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-30 02:10 -0700
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-04-30 14:34 +0000
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-04-30 17:18 +0200
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-30 10:04 -0700
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-04-30 04:13 -0500
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-04-30 18:40 +0200
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-04-30 12:50 -0500
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-03 22:01 -0700
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-04-30 04:09 -0500
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-06 19:29 -0700
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Elizabeth D Rather <erather@forth.com> - 2013-04-29 12:35 -1000
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-04-30 01:50 +0200
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-04-29 13:55 -1000
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-04-30 09:03 +0000
            Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-04-29 10:32 +0000
              Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-29 08:34 -0700
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-04-29 17:31 -0400
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-04-29 17:56 -0500
              Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. lynx <rinkasu@kaze.void.null> - 2013-04-29 22:38 +0000
    Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-04-29 12:31 +1000
      Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Spam@ControlQ.com - 2013-04-29 13:31 -0400
  Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. jlarsonfour3@gmail.com - 2013-04-29 08:14 -0700
  Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-04-29 10:28 -0700

csiph-web