Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #13097
| Date | 2012-06-19 20:46 -1000 |
|---|---|
| From | "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> |
| Organization | FORTH, Inc. |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: any chance of 4os being open sourced? |
| References | <8c054ac7-daf4-4eaa-ad84-7207e01685c7@p13g2000yqk.googlegroups.com> <14SdnZMOVJhBiHzSnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@supernews.com> <b4a2e412-073a-413c-b399-7b2ed801499d@s6g2000pbi.googlegroups.com> |
| Message-ID | <b5-dnUfPKM9P7HzSnZ2dnUVZ_rSdnZ2d@supernews.com> (permalink) |
On 6/19/12 6:03 PM, quiet_lad wrote: ... > > Has forth inc considered making something like 4os? SwiftX includes, for its target, a fully native, independent OS suitable for supporting a dedicated application (as opposed to a general-purpose OS to run whatever users want to run on it). It includes all I/O support for the target host (20+ embedded targets), a large library of standard routines, hosted cross-compiler, etc. Networking libraries may include parts of a TCP/IP stack, but we have never had need for a web browser. The most comprehensive native Forth OS I know is from Greg Bailey, of Athena Programming, who for many years supported a fully native and incredibly fast Forth on PC architecture with full TCP/IP stack (FTP and PPP, no HTML), database management, and other facilities under a monthly maintenance agreement. His systems supported networks of >1,000 users. Greg is now working for GreenArrays, and although I think he is still supporting his old customers, I don't think he is taking on new ones. Aloha, Elizabeth -- ================================================== Elizabeth D. Rather (US & Canada) 800-55-FORTH FORTH Inc. +1 310.999.6784 5959 West Century Blvd. Suite 700 Los Angeles, CA 90045 http://www.forth.com "Forth-based products and Services for real-time applications since 1973." ==================================================
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
any chance of 4os being open sourced? quiet_lad <gavcomedy@gmail.com> - 2012-06-19 17:06 -0700
Re: any chance of 4os being open sourced? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-06-19 14:14 -1000
Re: any chance of 4os being open sourced? quiet_lad <gavcomedy@gmail.com> - 2012-06-19 21:03 -0700
Re: any chance of 4os being open sourced? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-06-19 20:46 -1000
Re: any chance of 4os being open sourced? Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-06-20 01:03 -0700
Re: any chance of 4os being open sourced? quiet_lad <gavcomedy@gmail.com> - 2012-06-28 01:16 -0700
Re: any chance of 4os being open sourced? Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-06-28 02:57 -0700
Re: any chance of 4os being open sourced? marko <marko@marko.marko> - 2012-06-28 21:25 +1000
Re: any chance of 4os being open sourced? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-06-28 09:45 -0700
Re: any chance of 4os being open sourced? marko <marko@marko.marko> - 2012-06-29 10:28 +1000
Re: any chance of 4os being open sourced? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-06-28 14:47 -1000
Re: any chance of 4os being open sourced? forther <forther@gmail.com> - 2012-06-28 20:49 -0700
Re: any chance of 4os being open sourced? BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2012-06-28 21:10 -0700
Re: any chance of 4os being open sourced? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-06-28 21:17 -0700
Re: any chance of 4os being open sourced? vandys@vsta.org - 2012-06-29 04:58 +0000
Re: any chance of 4os being open sourced? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-06-29 03:42 -0500
Re: any chance of 4os being open sourced? quiet_lad <gavcomedy@gmail.com> - 2012-06-29 15:26 -0700
Re: any chance of 4os being open sourced? quiet_lad <gavcomedy@gmail.com> - 2012-06-29 15:34 -0700
Re: any chance of 4os being open sourced? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-06-30 00:37 -0700
Re: any chance of 4os being open sourced? "A. K." <akk@nospam.org> - 2012-06-30 11:06 +0200
Re: any chance of 4os being open sourced? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-06-30 04:28 -0500
Re: any chance of 4os being open sourced? quiet_lad <gavcomedy@gmail.com> - 2012-07-02 13:54 -0700
Re: any chance of 4os being open sourced? rugxulo@gmail.com - 2012-07-04 06:27 -0700
Re: any chance of 4os being open sourced? quiet_lad <gavcomedy@gmail.com> - 2012-07-02 13:53 -0700
Re: any chance of 4os being open sourced? quiet_lad <gavcomedy@gmail.com> - 2012-06-29 15:12 -0700
Re: any chance of 4os being open sourced? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-06-29 16:18 -0700
Re: any chance of 4os being open sourced? quiet_lad <gavcomedy@gmail.com> - 2012-06-29 15:11 -0700
Re: any chance of 4os being open sourced? marko <marko@marko.marko> - 2012-07-01 13:24 +1000
Re: any chance of 4os being open sourced? quiet_lad <gavcomedy@gmail.com> - 2012-07-02 13:52 -0700
Re: any chance of 4os being open sourced? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-06-28 08:59 -1000
csiph-web