Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.forth > #1206

Re: Renaissance of Forth

From Micke <oh2aun@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: Renaissance of Forth
Date 2011-04-13 23:42 -0700
Organization http://groups.google.com
Message-ID <38b3364d-ba09-4e63-8fdb-9f44b2d2bb95@p3g2000vbv.googlegroups.com> (permalink)
References (8 earlier) <3db12d31-3c08-4704-89f2-e62ce20d7e30@d12g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> <0fa3b606-358e-4701-915f-64693ed91bb0@e21g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> <39479e75-2eca-4dc1-9e21-d00e374c2fde@cu4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <cce8e352-5f0a-4419-af43-aa8ac370290f@t16g2000vbi.googlegroups.com> <835e6c04-a37f-4314-b919-ea0e15e3473a@r6g2000vbz.googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On Apr 14, 8:26 am, Bluebee <visualfo...@rocketmail.com> wrote:

> > The Microchip 16-bit architecture is much better than the 8-bit one.
>
> The PIC32 may be even better than Microchip's 16-bit architecture,
> because it has a MIPS CPU, somewhat comparable with the ARM.
> Additionally, the new PIC32MX5/6/7 families are pin compatible with
> the existing PIC32 and 16-bit PIC24F USB MCU families.

Since FlashForth is geared towards a Harward architecture,
porting some larger ARM/x86 based Forth to PIC32 could be more
productive.

>
> Microchip says migrating software across Microchip’s 600-plus 8-, 16-
> and 32-bit PIC® microcontroller portfolio is easy, as its development
> tools, USB stacks and TCP/IP stacks span the entire range of PIC.

That 'easy' part requires the you use the Mchip development tools and
libraries, and Forth is not
a part of that. So maybe not that 'easy'.

To support the different processor families the Mchip
library codes are full of conditional compilation macros. Not a pretty
sight.

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Renaissance of Forth visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2011-03-31 16:06 -0700
  Re: Renaissance of Forth Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2011-04-01 02:29 -0500
  Re: Renaissance of Forth Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2011-04-01 12:46 +0000
    Re: Renaissance of Forth Dennis <daruffer@gmail.com> - 2011-04-01 07:36 -0700
      Re: Renaissance of Forth Brad <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2011-04-01 07:47 -0700
      Re: Renaissance of Forth John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2011-04-01 16:40 -0700
        Re: Renaissance of Forth BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-04-01 18:20 -0700
    Re: Renaissance of Forth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-01 12:34 -0700
      Re: Renaissance of Forth Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2011-04-02 00:23 +0000
        Re: Renaissance of Forth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-01 16:24 -0700
  Re: Renaissance of Forth Gary Bergstrom <g.bergstrom@ieee.org> - 2011-04-01 08:36 -0700
  Re: Renaissance of Forth "The Beez'" <hansoft@bigfoot.com> - 2011-04-01 16:04 -0700
    Re: Renaissance of Forth mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2011-04-02 10:40 +0200
      Re: Renaissance of Forth John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2011-04-02 14:50 -0700
        Re: Renaissance of Forth "Massimo A. Dentico" <massimo_dentico@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-03 00:34 +0200
          Re: Renaissance of Forth John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2011-04-02 21:08 -0700
            Re: Renaissance of Forth mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2011-04-03 09:24 +0200
              Re: Renaissance of Forth John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2011-04-03 15:45 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-03 16:45 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth Elizabeth D Rather <erather@forth.com> - 2011-04-03 14:01 -1000
                Re: Renaissance of Forth Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2011-04-06 22:43 +0000
                Re: Renaissance of Forth BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-04-03 17:34 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2011-04-04 10:55 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth pliz <s.m.plis@gmail.com> - 2011-04-04 13:11 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2011-04-05 09:10 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-04-04 16:33 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth Elizabeth D Rather <erather@forth.com> - 2011-04-04 16:31 -1000
                Re: Renaissance of Forth BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-04-04 19:52 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2011-04-05 09:58 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-04-05 18:36 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2011-04-06 13:53 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-04-06 15:29 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2011-04-07 08:35 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-04-07 16:20 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2011-04-05 08:56 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2011-04-05 09:35 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth Bluebee <visualforth@rocketmail.com> - 2011-04-06 17:48 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth Bluebee <visualforth@rocketmail.com> - 2011-04-12 15:47 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2011-04-13 09:27 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth Bluebee <visualforth@rocketmail.com> - 2011-04-13 09:55 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth Richard Owlett <rowlett@pcnetinc.com> - 2011-04-13 13:02 -0500
                Re: Renaissance of Forth Elizabeth D Rather <erather@forth.com> - 2011-04-13 09:01 -1000
                Re: Renaissance of Forth Micke <oh2aun@gmail.com> - 2011-04-13 13:23 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth Bluebee <visualforth@rocketmail.com> - 2011-04-13 20:32 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth Micke <oh2aun@gmail.com> - 2011-04-13 20:52 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth Bluebee <visualforth@rocketmail.com> - 2011-04-13 22:26 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth Micke <oh2aun@gmail.com> - 2011-04-13 23:42 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth Bluebee <visualforth@rocketmail.com> - 2011-04-14 10:42 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth Micke <oh2aun@gmail.com> - 2011-04-14 13:06 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth Bluebee <visualforth@rocketmail.com> - 2011-04-14 14:26 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth Micke <oh2aun@gmail.com> - 2011-04-14 21:31 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth Bluebee <visualforth@rocketmail.com> - 2011-04-14 23:42 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth Micke <oh2aun@gmail.com> - 2011-04-15 00:56 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2011-04-15 08:03 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth Micke <oh2aun@gmail.com> - 2011-04-15 09:28 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2011-04-15 10:28 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2011-04-13 20:40 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth Bluebee <visualforth@rocketmail.com> - 2011-04-13 22:57 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2011-04-04 08:39 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-04 09:41 -0700
                Re: Renaissance of Forth Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2011-04-06 22:39 +0000
  Re: Renaissance of Forth Bluebee <visualforth@rocketmail.com> - 2011-04-02 20:32 -0700
    Re: Renaissance of Forth John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2011-04-02 22:06 -0700
      Re: Renaissance of Forth BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-04-03 07:17 -0700
  Re: Renaissance of Forth anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2011-04-04 17:09 +0000
    Re: Renaissance of Forth Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2011-04-05 15:55 +0200
      Re: Renaissance of Forth anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2011-04-07 16:25 +0000
        Re: Renaissance of Forth Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2011-04-08 21:07 +0200
          Re: Renaissance of Forth anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2011-04-09 17:29 +0000
            Re: Renaissance of Forth Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2011-04-10 18:39 +0200
      redirecting TYPE to a string (was: Renaissance of Forth) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2011-04-09 16:54 +0000
        Re: redirecting TYPE to a string (was: Renaissance of Forth) BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2011-04-09 13:07 -0700
        Re: redirecting TYPE to a string (was: Renaissance of Forth) Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2011-04-10 18:07 +0200

csiph-web