Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.forth > #14423

Re: Quotations revisited

From anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl)
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: Quotations revisited
Date 2012-07-26 13:06 +0000
Organization Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien
Message-ID <2012Jul26.150649@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <rLedneMHPeOzFZDNnZ2dnUVZ8m6dnZ2d@supernews.com> <2012Jul23.193222@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <zeGdnXosnYNZwZPNnZ2dnUVZ8uWdnZ2d@supernews.com> <2012Jul25.151520@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <w-6dnYeY9ZSQvo3NnZ2dnUVZ8tidnZ2d@supernews.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> writes:
>Anton Ertl <anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
>> Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> writes:
>>>Anton Ertl <anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
>>>> Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> writes:
>>>>>Anton Ertl <anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
>>>>>> At least for HEX. it is perfectly possible, although you have to take
>>>>>> a little care not to destroy any needed information before you are
>>>>>> sure that you are done:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> : hex. ( u -- )
>>>>>>  base @
>>>>>>  try
>>>>>>    over hex .
>>>>>>    0       \ value for throw
>>>>>>  restore
>>>>>>    over base !
>>>>>>  endtry
>>>>>>  throw
>>>>>>  2drop ;
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> If there is an interrupt during cleanup (between RESTORE and ENDTRY),
>>>>>> this code continues right after RESTORE and repeats the cleanup until
>>>>>> it is not interrupted
>>>>>
>>>>>I see, so exceptions in a cleanup handler restry the handler.
>>>>>
>>>>>> (yes, it's possible to create infinite loops with that).
>>>>>
>>>>>Indeed it is.  I would have thought that this was quite enough to
>>>>>disqualify it as a solution.
>>>> 
>>>> This is Forth, not a nanny language.  Why should that disqualify this
>>>> possibility disqualify it as a solution?  It's the responsibility of
>>>> the programmer to write his program so that it does not produce an
>>>> uncaught exception in the cleanup code (at least not every time).
>>>
>>>I suppose so, but that makes this mechanism unsuitable for, say, null
>>>pointer exceptions.
>> 
>> An invalid memory access in the protected region (between TRY and
>> RESTORE) is not a problem; of course you must avoid it in the cleanup
>> code (netween RESTORE and ENDTRY), but that's not particularly hard.
>> 
>>>  Also, some failures should be retried and some
>>>shouldn't.  Failures to close a channel probably shouldn't because
>>>they'll fail again.
>> 
>> I don't know what you mean with "channel" here, but let's assume that
>> a file will fit, and consider:
>> 
>> try ... restore over close-file throw endtry throw ...
>> 
>> Here the first THROW would certainly be a bug that can lead to an
>> infinite loop.  So instead of throwing an exception we should handle a
>> failure of the CLOSE-FILE differently.  But the failure of the
>> CLOSE-FILE itself does not cause a retry.
>
>That doesn't always help, though: you can't in all cases prevent words
>used in cleanups from THROWing.

Example?

>  I presume that's why other
>languages with exception handlers and cleanups don't do this,

Or maybe they just do the safe point thing already for other reasons
(say, concurrent garbage collection), and they don't need to deal with
synchronous exceptions, so they decided to use the safe point stuff
to provide atomic cleanup as well.

Or maybe somebody told the designers: "Nobody has done this before, so
it's impossible." :-)

>If you're lucky, yes.  It may require undoing a list, though, and if
>you want to restart that process you have to know just how far you'd
>got or you'll be removing multiple links.

Remembering how far you got does not look like a good approach to me,
although it may be workable in some cases.

My take on it is writing the code such that you don't need to know how
far you got; I call this "idempotent" in the paper.

For the BASE-restoring case this means copying the old base with OVER
and DROPping the preserved copy after the recovery code (see above).

For unlinking a linked list one may copy the original list pointer
into a separate location in the setup code (in Forth I would put it on
the stack), so we can overwrite the list pointer location as often as
we want without destroying the information about the start.

>> Then it's just a question of choosing the right data structure.
>
>It is.  This IMO an example of "the tail wagging the dog": if you want
>to use cleanups in this form you have to make sure that every cleanup
>action is idempotent.

Yes.

>> OTOH, the approach above also works for synchronous exceptions (e.g.,
>> stack overflow); I don't think it would be such a good idea to
>> continue running the code after such an exception until we reach a
>> safe point.
>
>That's true.  Java makes very sure that stack overflows are always at
>known points.  It'd be a bit harder in Forth, but far from impossible.

But stack overflow is not the only synchronous exception in Forth (at
least not in Gforth): Division by zero or Division overflow, invalid
memory access, address alignment exception, write to broken pipe,
illegal instruction, etc.

>FYI, Java safepoints are at returns, potentially unbound backward
>branches (i.e. not simple for-loops), synchronization, and a few other
>things such as dynamic memory allocation.  Probes to detect stack
>overflow are at method entry.

Tail wagging the dog, hmm?

>> People have been doing things like RCU (read-copy-update) to avoid
>> having to lock out other code (with the associated locking code), and
>> it works.  So I think it should be possible to write code in a way
>> that avoids having to lock out "interruptions".
>
>That's true, but it imposes a very strict discipline on how people can
>write their code; I'm talking here about general mechanisms.

Yes, writing the cleanup code requires a strict discipline.  I don't
expect that much cleanup to be necessary, though.  And if you do not
find a way to write idempotent code, you can fall back to just using
CATCH cleanup THROW; you will have a window of vulnerability during
execution of the cleanup code, but you will be no worse off than with,
say, LISP's unwind-protect.

>Consider transactional memory, for example.  It's very important that
>when an exception is thrown the transaction either commits or is
>aborted: you cannot have visible intermediate states.  Cleanup code
>has to either commit the transaction or rollback.  Either way, you
>have to release a bunch of locks, and as soon as you've released a
>lock some other thread can update the associated memory.

It seems to me that this is a harder problem than just of cleanup
code, although the idea that one can use a cleanup mechanism to solve
this problem suggests itself.

Concerning your locks, you then have to write your cleanup code such
that it does not read memory that is protected by locks, say, only
thread-private memory.

- anton
-- 
M. Anton Ertl  http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/home.html
comp.lang.forth FAQs: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/faq/toc.html
     New standard: http://www.forth200x.org/forth200x.html
   EuroForth 2012: http://www.euroforth.org/ef12/

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Quotations revisited mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2012-07-14 15:55 +0200
  Re: Quotations revisited stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2012-07-15 19:26 +0000
    Re: Quotations revisited Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-07-15 23:53 +0200
    Re: Quotations revisited mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2012-07-15 23:54 +0200
      Re: Quotations revisited Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-07-16 00:48 +0200
        Re: Quotations revisited Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-07-22 15:01 +0000
          Re: Quotations revisited anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-07-23 16:49 +0000
            Re: Quotations revisited Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-07-23 21:39 +0000
              Re: Quotations revisited anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-07-25 13:13 +0000
        Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-07-22 11:07 -0500
          Re: Quotations revisited Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-07-22 10:21 -0700
            Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-07-22 12:35 -0500
              Re: Quotations revisited Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-07-22 11:39 -0700
                Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-07-22 15:16 -0500
                Re: Quotations revisited Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-07-22 14:35 -0700
                Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-07-23 04:18 -0500
                Re: Quotations revisited Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-07-23 12:58 +0000
                Re: Quotations revisited Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-07-23 11:55 -0700
                Re: Quotations revisited BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2012-07-23 05:45 -0700
            Re: Quotations revisited Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-07-27 12:41 +0000
      Re: Quotations revisited "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-07-15 14:11 -1000
        Re: Quotations revisited "A. K." <akk@nospam.org> - 2012-07-16 07:47 +0200
          Re: Quotations revisited anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-07-16 13:56 +0000
            Re: Quotations revisited "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-07-16 07:20 -1000
              Re: Quotations revisited anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-07-17 13:49 +0000
        Re: Quotations revisited Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-07-16 02:32 -0700
          Re: Quotations revisited Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-07-27 12:58 +0000
        Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-07-16 04:32 -0500
          Re: Quotations revisited stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2012-07-16 11:41 +0000
            Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-07-16 07:40 -0500
              Re: Quotations revisited stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2012-07-16 14:05 +0000
                Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-07-16 09:20 -0500
                Re: Quotations revisited stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2012-07-16 15:46 +0000
                Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-07-16 11:33 -0500
                Re: Quotations revisited anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-07-16 15:32 +0000
                Re: Quotations revisited stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2012-07-16 17:56 +0000
                Re: Quotations revisited Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-07-16 23:37 +0200
          Re: Quotations revisited Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-07-27 13:05 +0000
            Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-07-27 08:21 -0500
      Re: Quotations revisited Roelf Toxopeus <rt4all@notthis.hetnet.nl> - 2012-07-16 10:14 +0200
      Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-07-16 04:23 -0500
        Re: Quotations revisited m.a.m.hendrix@tue.nl - 2012-07-16 03:39 -0700
          Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-07-16 07:09 -0500
            Re: Quotations revisited mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2012-07-16 23:47 +0200
              Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-07-17 04:14 -0500
                Re: Quotations revisited Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2012-07-17 17:39 +0200
                Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-07-17 12:18 -0500
                Re: Quotations revisited mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2012-07-17 20:26 +0200
                Re: Quotations revisited anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-07-19 16:21 +0000
                Re: Quotations revisited Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-07-19 15:58 -0700
      Re: Quotations revisited anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-07-16 14:05 +0000
    Re: Quotations revisited anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-07-16 12:47 +0000
      Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-07-16 08:56 -0500
      Re: Quotations revisited Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2012-07-16 15:04 +0100
        Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-07-16 09:23 -0500
          Re: Quotations revisited Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2012-07-16 17:38 +0100
            Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-07-16 12:58 -0500
        Re: Quotations revisited anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-07-16 14:56 +0000
      Re: Quotations revisited Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-07-16 22:53 +0000
        Re: Quotations revisited BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2012-07-16 19:59 -0700
          Re: Quotations revisited "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-07-16 17:04 -1000
            Re: Quotations revisited anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-07-17 06:51 +0000
              Re: Quotations revisited "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-07-16 21:39 -1000
                Re: Quotations revisited anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-07-17 07:48 +0000
                Re: Quotations revisited "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-07-16 22:24 -1000
                Re: Quotations revisited anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-07-17 10:48 +0000
                Re: Quotations revisited "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-07-17 08:19 -1000
                Re: Quotations revisited Aleksej Saushev <asau@inbox.ru> - 2012-07-18 01:31 +0400
                Re: Quotations revisited anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-07-19 16:11 +0000
                Re: Quotations revisited "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-07-19 12:41 -1000
                Re: Quotations revisited Aleksej Saushev <asau@inbox.ru> - 2012-07-21 01:24 +0400
                Re: Quotations revisited "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-07-20 16:20 -1000
                Re: Quotations revisited Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-07-21 03:59 -0700
                Re: Quotations revisited "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-07-21 21:33 -1000
                Re: Quotations revisited Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-07-22 01:35 -0700
                Re: Quotations revisited Aleksej Saushev <asau@inbox.ru> - 2012-07-22 21:19 +0400
                Re: Quotations revisited "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-07-22 08:15 -1000
                Re: Quotations revisited Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-07-22 11:48 -0700
                Re: Quotations revisited Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2012-07-22 21:48 +0200
                Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-07-22 15:22 -0500
                Re: Quotations revisited Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-07-22 14:50 -0700
                Re: Quotations revisited Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-07-22 15:08 -0700
                Re: Quotations revisited Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-07-22 15:20 -0700
                Re: Quotations revisited Aleksej Saushev <asau@inbox.ru> - 2012-07-23 03:29 +0400
                Re: Quotations revisited "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-07-22 14:22 -1000
                Re: Quotations revisited Aleksej Saushev <asau@inbox.ru> - 2012-07-23 05:46 +0400
                Re: Quotations revisited "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-07-22 21:46 -1000
                Re: Quotations revisited Aleksej Saushev <asau@inbox.ru> - 2012-07-25 03:31 +0400
                Re: Quotations revisited anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-07-23 16:50 +0000
                Re: Quotations revisited "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-07-23 07:57 -1000
                Re: Quotations revisited Aleksej Saushev <asau@inbox.ru> - 2012-07-25 03:38 +0400
                Re: Quotations revisited anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-07-26 13:01 +0000
                Re: Quotations revisited Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-07-21 12:10 +0000
                Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-07-21 09:19 -0500
                Re: Quotations revisited Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-07-21 18:58 +0200
                Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-07-22 04:24 -0500
                Re: Quotations revisited Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-07-22 14:25 +0200
                Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-07-22 11:11 -0500
                Re: Quotations revisited Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-07-21 19:29 +0000
                Re: Quotations revisited anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-07-23 16:31 +0000
                Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-07-23 12:21 -0500
                Re: Quotations revisited anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-07-23 17:32 +0000
                Re: Quotations revisited Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-07-23 11:23 -0700
                Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-07-24 03:28 -0500
                Re: Quotations revisited anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-07-25 13:15 +0000
                Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-07-25 11:47 -0500
                Re: Quotations revisited anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-07-26 13:06 +0000
                Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-07-26 09:50 -0500
                Re: Quotations revisited anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-07-26 15:11 +0000
                Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-07-26 11:06 -0500
                Re: Quotations revisited anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-07-26 16:46 +0000
                Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-07-27 04:52 -0500
                Re: Quotations revisited Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-07-26 09:48 -0700
                Re: Quotations revisited anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-07-27 14:51 +0000
                Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-07-28 08:29 -0500
                Re: Quotations revisited Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-07-29 20:55 -0700
                Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-07-30 04:40 -0500
                Re: Quotations revisited Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-07-31 23:46 -0700
                Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-08-01 04:30 -0500
                Re: Quotations revisited anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-07-23 16:17 +0000
                Re: Quotations revisited "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-07-22 18:41 -0400
                Re: Quotations revisited anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-07-23 16:53 +0000
            Re: Quotations revisited Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-07-17 12:22 +0000
              Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-07-17 07:30 -0500
                Re: Quotations revisited Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-07-17 06:34 -0700
                Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-07-17 09:04 -0500
                Re: Quotations revisited Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-07-18 07:07 -0700
                Re: Quotations revisited Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2012-07-18 17:43 +0200
                Re: Quotations revisited Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-07-18 09:29 -0700
                Re: Quotations revisited Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2012-07-18 20:59 +0200
                Re: Quotations revisited Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2012-07-18 21:14 +0200
                Re: Quotations revisited anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-07-19 16:05 +0000
                Re: Quotations revisited Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-07-20 14:50 +0000
                Re: Quotations revisited anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-07-20 15:08 +0000
                Re: Quotations revisited Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-07-21 11:27 +0000
                Re: Quotations revisited anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-07-23 16:28 +0000
                Re: Quotations revisited Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-07-23 19:41 +0000
                Re: Quotations revisited Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-07-18 10:18 -0700
                Re: Quotations revisited anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-07-19 17:00 +0000
                Re: Quotations revisited Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-07-19 15:34 -0700
                Re: Quotations revisited Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-07-19 16:08 -0700
                Re: Quotations revisited Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-07-17 20:09 +0200
  Re: Quotations revisited stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2012-07-16 12:01 +0000
    Re: Quotations revisited Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-07-16 10:42 -0700
      Re: Quotations revisited stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2012-07-16 18:06 +0000
        Re: Quotations revisited "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-07-16 11:08 -1000
          Re: Quotations revisited stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2012-07-16 21:38 +0000
            Re: Quotations revisited Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-07-17 00:29 +0200
              Re: Quotations revisited "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-07-16 12:38 -1000
                Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-07-17 04:20 -0500
                Re: Quotations revisited Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-07-17 03:21 -0700
                Re: Quotations revisited Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-07-17 03:14 -0700
                Re: Quotations revisited Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-07-17 19:58 +0200
                Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-07-17 13:05 -0500
  Re: Quotations revisited stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2012-07-20 11:12 +0000
    Re: Quotations revisited Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-07-20 05:40 -0700
      Re: Quotations revisited stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2012-07-20 15:55 +0000
    Re: Quotations revisited Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-07-22 20:54 -0700
      Re: Quotations revisited Aleksej Saushev <asau@inbox.ru> - 2012-07-25 03:55 +0400

csiph-web