Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #123737
| Path | csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? |
| Date | Sun, 3 Dec 2017 11:20:03 +1300 |
| Lines | 68 |
| Message-ID | <f8gn8jFrrtU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <e10414e1-e674-4a1c-96e7-39e598cc4dc9@googlegroups.com> <8baec7c1-5c5e-4391-b011-9317ff220752@googlegroups.com> <XNDTB.102542$au1.26875@fx45.am4> <w5ETB.84939$bN1.53680@fx14.am4> <c73af526-10fe-46c3-a98b-ec3345ec9238@googlegroups.com> <DiHTB.65770$7d.19343@fx05.am4> <1679454a-2d88-4821-be92-a73dba4d4d75@googlegroups.com> <jFSTB.60693$1M.45530@fx32.am4> <bfeUB.110929$au1.21996@fx45.am4> <sufUB.3600$bx.564@fx42.iad> <4%fUB.65585$M61.56524@fx38.am4> <lnpo7yw6q0.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <JdkUB.50935$UP1.28649@fx31.am4> <ovuj8g$geq$1@dont-email.me> <ImDUB.111267$W61.42286@fx08.am4> <f8gg0pFrrtU1@mid.individual.net> <0tFUB.85166$sg1.2798@fx43.am4> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net Tk4wGLlOMR6gJuKHveiLNQxWjudFthqcrifTUWzpfkl59Vul5S |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:7x2oA9B+iuM5YAoP07pkFQISYMQ= |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <0tFUB.85166$sg1.2798@fx43.am4> |
| Content-Language | en-US |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.c:123737 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 12/03/2017 11:06 AM, bartc wrote: > On 02/12/2017 20:16, Ian Collins wrote: >> On 12/03/2017 08:42 AM, bartc wrote: >>> On 02/12/2017 16:09, David Brown wrote: >>> >>>> But C function calls are as easy as it gets. >>> >>> And apparently you DO think that! The docs for a typical C function are >>> for the benefit of someone wanting to use the function FROM C. Any other >>> information essential for using that function from elsewhere is not >>> included. >> >> The platform ABI tells you all you need to know. > > About what, the call convention? Which on 32-bit Windows is variable anyway. > > It doesn't say anything about types that C code has invented and where > the definitions rely on compiling a bunch of C header code. > > Take this function from SDL: > > extern DECLSPEC int SDLCALL SDL_SetWindowModalFor(SDL_Window * > modal_window, SDL_Window * parent_window); > > If you're calling it from C, then it's straightforward: you include the > requisite headers, define the appropriate variables of the right types, > and call. > > From another language however, you can't do that: you have to > painstakingly track down the definitions of each type (and usually they > will be structs consisting of a bunch of other types). You need to > establish the layout and alignment of those structs so as to create > exact duplicates. And if you're unlucky, there will be a mess of > conditional code so that even that is not clear. So in C you can happily call something without understanding it, but from from another language you have to understand what you are calling? I see, very interesting. > Even by this point, so you still have the obstacle of using the library, > which can be tricky even using C, but now you might have a buggy > interface to contend with too. And any example code will be in C. Some code has bugs? I didn't know that. > And this is just one library; it contains 540 C header files containing > stuff to duplicate. GTK contains 600. MSVC has 2100 headers in total. > > You were saying about the platform ABI telling me all I need? Sure! I'm saying the ABI + understanding what you are doing is all you need. > This stuff is always going to be a big job, but C and the way C is > typically written makes it much harder than necessary. So that's why it has become the near universal interface language? I've often wondered why. > It doesn't help that people who have obviously never done anything like > this keep saying it's so simple. Sorry to disappoint you, but I have done this. I'll admit that I've had the good judgment (and a little luck) never to have to do son Windows, but I written native interface wrappers for PHP. -- Ian
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Some kind of contextual modulo operator? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-11-29 10:41 -0800
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2017-11-29 11:12 -0800
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-11-29 19:22 +0000
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-11-29 19:43 +0000
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2017-11-29 12:33 -0800
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-11-29 23:22 +0000
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2017-11-29 20:53 -0800
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-11-30 12:17 +0000
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-12-01 15:08 +0000
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-12-01 07:31 -0800
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-12-01 16:32 +0000
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-12-01 17:07 +0000
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-12-01 09:15 -0800
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-12-01 18:14 +0000
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-12-01 19:03 +0000
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-12-01 20:54 +0000
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-12-01 12:09 -0800
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-12-01 21:56 +0000
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-12-01 23:11 +0000
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-12-01 15:16 -0800
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-12-02 17:09 +0100
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-12-02 19:42 +0000
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-12-03 09:16 +1300
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-12-02 22:06 +0000
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-12-03 11:20 +1300
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-12-03 00:01 +0000
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-12-03 13:55 +1300
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-12-03 02:14 +0000
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-12-03 16:13 +1300
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-12-03 12:28 +0000
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-12-03 14:26 +0000
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-12-04 10:49 +1300
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-12-04 10:38 +1300
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-12-03 23:00 +0000
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-12-04 12:10 +1300
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-12-03 23:33 +0000
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-12-04 13:18 +1300
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-12-04 12:19 +0000
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-12-05 07:58 +1300
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-12-04 00:30 +0100
Packed structs (was Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator?) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-12-04 15:02 +0000
Re: Packed structs (was Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator?) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-12-04 16:34 +0100
Re: Packed structs (was Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator?) Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-12-04 09:23 -0800
Re: Packed structs (was Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator?) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-12-04 18:31 +0000
Re: Packed structs (was Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator?) supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-12-04 15:37 -0800
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-12-04 08:39 -0800
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2017-12-03 18:13 -0800
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-12-03 14:50 +1300
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-12-04 15:00 +0000
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-12-04 15:53 +0000
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-12-04 18:26 +0000
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-12-04 10:34 -0800
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-12-03 19:40 +0100
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2017-12-03 11:35 -0800
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-12-04 14:59 +0000
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-12-01 08:56 -0800
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-12-01 08:58 -0800
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-12-01 18:16 +0000
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-12-01 10:28 -0800
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-12-01 20:19 +0100
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2017-12-01 22:22 +0000
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2017-12-01 07:49 -0800
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-12-01 16:54 +0000
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2017-12-01 09:34 -0800
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-12-01 18:48 +0000
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2017-12-01 11:27 -0800
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-11-29 12:17 -0800
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-11-30 12:27 +0000
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-11-30 06:11 -0800
Re: Some kind of contextual modulo operator? "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2017-11-29 15:02 -0500
Some kind of contextual modulo operator? mcheung63@gmail.com - 2017-12-08 23:20 -0800
csiph-web