Re: Good hash for pointers

From	Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: Good hash for pointers
Date	2024-06-23 11:23 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<86v81zfrhv.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink)
References	(15 earlier) <20240606110009.00001096@yahoo.com> <86zfrkj93b.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20240617123926.00006a12@yahoo.com> <86ed8ujg7j.fsf@linuxsc.com> <v4t4tq$1j49k$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:

> Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes:
> ...
>
>> I see.  So it isn't that you think "ANSI C" is wrong, just
>> that it might be misleading or that C89 or C90 is preferable.
>
> ANSI's documentation is quite clear about the fact that there is, at any
> time, only one ANSI C standard, [...]

I'm not talking about ANSI's documentation.  I'm talking about
how people use the term ANSI C.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-17 00:56 -0700
  Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-17 12:39 +0300
    Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-18 10:47 -0700
      Re: Good hash for pointers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-06-18 15:17 -0700
        Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-18 16:17 -0700
      Re: Good hash for pointers James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2024-06-18 19:23 -0400
        Re: Good hash for pointers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-06-18 17:17 -0700
        Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-23 11:23 -0700

csiph-web