Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #386188

Re: Good hash for pointers

Show all headers | View raw

Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes:

> On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 00:56:40 -0700
> Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wrote:
>
>> I don't know why you say that.  C was an ANSI standard before it
>> was an ISO standard.  Or is it that you think that the language
>> Malcolm is intent on using does not conform to C90/C89/ANSI C?
>
> All I wanted to point by this comment is that ANSI recognizes ISO/IEC
> 9899:2018 as their current C Standard and probably will recognize the
> next ISO C Standard pretty soon.  For that reason I think that names like
> C89 or C90 are preferable (to ANSI C) when we want to refer to this
> particular variant of the language.

I see.  So it isn't that you think "ANSI C" is wrong, just
that it might be misleading or that C89 or C90 is preferable.
Personally I would be surprised if someone used "ANSI C" to
mean anything other than C89/C90, but certainly other people
could have a different reaction.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-17 00:56 -0700
  Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-17 12:39 +0300
    Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-18 10:47 -0700
      Re: Good hash for pointers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-06-18 15:17 -0700
        Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-18 16:17 -0700
      Re: Good hash for pointers James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2024-06-18 19:23 -0400
        Re: Good hash for pointers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-06-18 17:17 -0700
        Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-23 11:23 -0700

csiph-web