Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Rentsch Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Good hash for pointers Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 11:23:08 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 13 Message-ID: <86v81zfrhv.fsf@linuxsc.com> References: <86fru6gsqr.fsf@linuxsc.com> <8634q5hjsp.fsf@linuxsc.com> <86le3wfsmd.fsf@linuxsc.com> <86ed9ofq14.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20240605005916.00001b33@yahoo.com> <86a5jzmle1.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20240605195905.00002484@yahoo.com> <86y17ilm4k.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20240606110009.00001096@yahoo.com> <86zfrkj93b.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20240617123926.00006a12@yahoo.com> <86ed8ujg7j.fsf@linuxsc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 20:23:09 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0b6502de53f4a38a6a5d9b1aa17823cb"; logging-data="464194"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18ztdbXDdgHyyu7fGm9xzlyMwdHRv0yzFA=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:IyPUnV8GRrepjg0zZkhEUTenPFY= sha1:suxxjJktbQ0QdoQRaKpRPkQzxXY= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:386399 James Kuyper writes: > Tim Rentsch writes: > ... > >> I see. So it isn't that you think "ANSI C" is wrong, just >> that it might be misleading or that C89 or C90 is preferable. > > ANSI's documentation is quite clear about the fact that there is, at any > time, only one ANSI C standard, [...] I'm not talking about ANSI's documentation. I'm talking about how people use the term ANSI C.