Re: Good hash for pointers

From	Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: Good hash for pointers
Date	2024-06-17 12:39 +0300
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<20240617123926.00006a12@yahoo.com> (permalink)
References	(12 earlier) <86a5jzmle1.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20240605195905.00002484@yahoo.com> <86y17ilm4k.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20240606110009.00001096@yahoo.com> <86zfrkj93b.fsf@linuxsc.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 00:56:40 -0700
Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wrote:

> 
> I don't know why you say that.  C was an ANSI standard before it
> was an ISO standard.  Or is it that you think that the language
> Malcolm is intent on using does not conform to C90/C89/ANSI C?
> 
> 

All I wanted to point by this comment is that ANSI recognizes ISO/IEC
9899:2018 as their current C Standard and probably will recognize the
next ISO C Standard pretty soon. For that reason I think that names like
C89 or C90 are preferable (to ANSI C) when we want to refer to this
particular variant of the language.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-05 08:58 -0700
  AES problem (was: Good hash for pointers) Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-05 19:51 +0300
    Re: AES problem (was: Good hash for pointers) Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-05 21:24 -0700
  Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-05 19:59 +0300
    Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-05 21:40 -0700
      Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-06 11:00 +0300
        Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-17 00:56 -0700
          Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-17 12:39 +0300
            Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-18 10:47 -0700
              Re: Good hash for pointers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-06-18 15:17 -0700
                Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-18 16:17 -0700
              Re: Good hash for pointers James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2024-06-18 19:23 -0400
                Re: Good hash for pointers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-06-18 17:17 -0700
                Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-23 11:23 -0700
  Re: Good hash for pointers Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-06-06 13:35 +0300
    Re: Good hash for pointers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-06-16 04:38 -0700
      Re: Good hash for pointers "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-06-16 12:34 -0700

csiph-web