Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.basic.visual.misc > #2208
| From | GS <gs@somewhere.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.basic.visual.misc |
| Subject | Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? |
| Date | 2014-12-22 01:25 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <m78dgh$6e7$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <m75d68$7k3$1@dont-email.me> <27223c8b-f219-4a4e-ac2c-d7112f83a505@googlegroups.com> <0cqe9a1p2mdiocunrihn8j1j5g09u7o489@4ax.com> <29c83bce-6022-4cf5-8df0-2fc45fb646e0@googlegroups.com> <m78df2$6ah$1@dont-email.me> |
Typo... IMO, the NTFS on Win7/8 is not the same NTFS on XP/w2k! There are > definitely issues with how the 2 interact with each other, the former > having to do some 'back-pedalling' (I suspect) to deal with the x86 > NTFS. > > Whether moving the archive to a Win7 machine will resolve anything is > something you'll have to try. I've never done that so I can't confirm > any advantage, but it's an interesting idea!!! -- Garry Free usenet access at http://www.eternal-september.org Classic VB Users Regroup! comp.lang.basic.visual.misc microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion
Back to comp.lang.basic.visual.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? jsigmo@gmail.com - 2014-12-20 11:35 -0800
Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2014-12-20 14:40 -0500
Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? jsigmo@gmail.com - 2014-12-20 11:53 -0800
Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2014-12-20 18:32 -0500
Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2014-12-20 22:01 -0500
Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2014-12-20 22:08 -0500
Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2014-12-20 22:34 -0500
Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2014-12-21 04:46 -0500
Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? jsigmo@gmail.com - 2014-12-21 10:34 -0800
Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? ralph <nt_consulting@yahoo.com> - 2014-12-21 18:57 -0600
Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? jsigmo@gmail.com - 2014-12-21 20:52 -0800
Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2014-12-22 01:24 -0500
Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2014-12-22 01:25 -0500
Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2014-12-21 18:08 -0500
Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2014-12-21 19:52 -0500
Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? GS <gesansom@netscape.net> - 2014-12-21 19:51 -0500
csiph-web