Groups > comp.lang.basic.visual.misc > #2198

Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"?

From	"Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.basic.visual.misc
Subject	Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"?
Date	2014-12-20 22:34 -0500
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<m75f4n$isf$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<316f98fa-3f4e-478f-b59e-ee231d032419@googlegroups.com> <m74jan$9h$1@dont-email.me> <11314f9e-62e5-4885-bf61-24f713a0dabb@googlegroups.com> <m75d68$7k3$1@dont-email.me> <m75din$8qt$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

| Is that Windows Explorer or Internet Explorer? (I have a file manager
| app that has its own builtin file explorer that, so far, works fine up
| to Win8.1)
|

  I use it in Windows Explorer, but actually the
two can't be fully separated. What I wrote is
not a file explorer but an Explorer Bar. It's a
shell extension. You can find the standard ones
in folder windows under View -> Explorer Bar.
I wrote my own with XP to replace the custom
folder.htt that I used in Win98.

http://www.jsware.net/jsware/jsfv.php5

It works in XP and Win7, but 32 shell extensions
can't run in 64-bit processes. Originally I think
Win7-64 used 32-bit Explorer and IE by default,
but that's no longer true.

Thread

Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? jsigmo@gmail.com - 2014-12-20 11:35 -0800
  Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2014-12-20 14:40 -0500
    Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? jsigmo@gmail.com - 2014-12-20 11:53 -0800
      Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2014-12-20 18:32 -0500
      Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2014-12-20 22:01 -0500
        Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2014-12-20 22:08 -0500
          Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2014-12-20 22:34 -0500
            Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2014-12-21 04:46 -0500
        Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? jsigmo@gmail.com - 2014-12-21 10:34 -0800
          Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? ralph <nt_consulting@yahoo.com> - 2014-12-21 18:57 -0600
            Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? jsigmo@gmail.com - 2014-12-21 20:52 -0800
              Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2014-12-22 01:24 -0500
                Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2014-12-22 01:25 -0500
          Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2014-12-21 18:08 -0500
          Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2014-12-21 19:52 -0500
          Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? GS <gesansom@netscape.net> - 2014-12-21 19:51 -0500

csiph-web