Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.basic.visual.misc > #2196

Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"?

From "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam>
Newsgroups comp.lang.basic.visual.misc
Subject Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"?
Date 2014-12-20 22:01 -0500
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <m75d68$7k3$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <316f98fa-3f4e-478f-b59e-ee231d032419@googlegroups.com> <m74jan$9h$1@dont-email.me> <11314f9e-62e5-4885-bf61-24f713a0dabb@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

   As Garry asked, what are the problems?
The only showstopper I know of is 64-bit.
I have an Explorer Bar I can't install on
Win64 because it runs in the Explorer process.
And security can be a bit of a headache. Aside
from that I haven't had problems. VB6 is still one
of the most widely compatible off all tools, running
on virtually all current Windows systems with no
added support files necessary.

Back to comp.lang.basic.visual.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? jsigmo@gmail.com - 2014-12-20 11:35 -0800
  Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2014-12-20 14:40 -0500
    Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? jsigmo@gmail.com - 2014-12-20 11:53 -0800
      Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2014-12-20 18:32 -0500
      Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2014-12-20 22:01 -0500
        Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2014-12-20 22:08 -0500
          Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2014-12-20 22:34 -0500
            Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2014-12-21 04:46 -0500
        Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? jsigmo@gmail.com - 2014-12-21 10:34 -0800
          Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? ralph <nt_consulting@yahoo.com> - 2014-12-21 18:57 -0600
            Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? jsigmo@gmail.com - 2014-12-21 20:52 -0800
              Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2014-12-22 01:24 -0500
                Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2014-12-22 01:25 -0500
          Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2014-12-21 18:08 -0500
          Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2014-12-21 19:52 -0500
          Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? GS <gesansom@netscape.net> - 2014-12-21 19:51 -0500

csiph-web