Groups > comp.lang.basic.visual.misc > #2192

Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"?

Newsgroups	comp.lang.basic.visual.misc
Date	2014-12-20 11:35 -0800
Message-ID	<316f98fa-3f4e-478f-b59e-ee231d032419@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"?
From	jsigmo@gmail.com

Show all headers | View raw

For whatever reason, I remember thinking it might be nice to try to move to VB.Net many years ago, but part of what turned me off was the thought that I could no longer "own" the development program the way I owned VS6, but instead had to subscribe to it.

Perhaps I was wrong then.  It appears that now this is not the case.

Back to comp.lang.basic.visual.misc | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? jsigmo@gmail.com - 2014-12-20 11:35 -0800
  Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2014-12-20 14:40 -0500
    Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? jsigmo@gmail.com - 2014-12-20 11:53 -0800
      Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2014-12-20 18:32 -0500
      Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2014-12-20 22:01 -0500
        Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2014-12-20 22:08 -0500
          Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2014-12-20 22:34 -0500
            Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2014-12-21 04:46 -0500
        Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? jsigmo@gmail.com - 2014-12-21 10:34 -0800
          Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? ralph <nt_consulting@yahoo.com> - 2014-12-21 18:57 -0600
            Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? jsigmo@gmail.com - 2014-12-21 20:52 -0800
              Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2014-12-22 01:24 -0500
                Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2014-12-22 01:25 -0500
          Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2014-12-21 18:08 -0500
          Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2014-12-21 19:52 -0500
          Re: Am I mistaken, or was .NET originally offered only as a "subscription"? GS <gesansom@netscape.net> - 2014-12-21 19:51 -0500

csiph-web