Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.basic.misc > #349
| From | Todd Vargo <tlvargo@sbcglobal.netz> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.basic.misc, comp.sys.sinclair |
| Subject | Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? |
| Date | 2012-12-06 23:55 -0500 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <k9rss3$7u8$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <86lidbwwtk.fsf@gray.siamics.net> <62d4af2f-931a-4b84-8b2d-8a0e4a8d9e5c@i2g2000pbi.googlegroups.com> <alpine.NEB.2.00.1212061434020.22851@panix2.panix.com> <k9r21s$i4a$1@news.albasani.net> <66426f7a-9659-4f1a-9952-3cf7c0a37893@s14g2000yqg.googlegroups.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 12/6/2012 5:27 PM, news@rtrussell.co.uk wrote: > On Dec 6, 9:17 pm, Todd Vargo <tlva...@sbcglobal.netz> wrote: >> 'stripped down' has long been the accepted definition. > > Accepted by whom? Not by me! Look in any dictionary and you'll find > that "stripped down" means 'reduced to the bare essentials', 'reduced > to its simplest form' or 'having only essential features'. None of > those descriptions applies to QBasic: there are a few features of > QuickBasic that it doesn't support but in most cases that is a result > of them being incompatible with an interpreted language. > > Richard. I forgot to include the disclaimer, YMMV. -- Todd Vargo (Post questions to group only. Remove "z" to email personal messages)
Back to comp.lang.basic.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> - 2012-11-26 12:32 +0700
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? SamTek <rogerjowett@gmail.com> - 2012-11-26 10:05 -0800
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? "Auric__" <not.my.real@email.address> - 2012-11-26 18:47 +0000
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Andrew Owen <aowen10@mail.bbk.ac.uk> - 2012-11-29 00:02 +0000
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> - 2012-12-06 12:53 +0700
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? "news@rtrussell.co.uk" <news@rtrussell.co.uk> - 2012-12-06 09:00 -0800
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Paul Bartlett <bartlett@panix.com> - 2012-12-06 14:40 -0500
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Todd Vargo <tlvargo@sbcglobal.netz> - 2012-12-06 16:17 -0500
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? "news@rtrussell.co.uk" <news@rtrussell.co.uk> - 2012-12-06 14:27 -0800
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.com> - 2012-12-06 17:19 -0600
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? "news@rtrussell.co.uk" <news@rtrussell.co.uk> - 2012-12-07 02:01 -0800
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Todd Vargo <tlvargo@sbcglobal.netz> - 2012-12-07 14:09 -0500
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.com> - 2012-12-07 22:03 -0600
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? "news@rtrussell.co.uk" <news@rtrussell.co.uk> - 2012-12-08 14:52 -0800
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? ppnerkDELETETHIS@yahoo.com (Phred) - 2012-12-12 13:55 +0000
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Todd Vargo <tlvargo@sbcglobal.netz> - 2012-12-06 23:55 -0500
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Paul Bartlett <bartlett@panix.com> - 2012-12-06 20:30 -0500
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Todd Vargo <tlvargo@sbcglobal.netz> - 2012-12-06 23:40 -0500
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> - 2012-12-07 21:05 +0700
csiph-web