Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.basic.misc > #334
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.basic.misc |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-11-26 10:05 -0800 |
| References | <86zk253p5x.fsf@gray.siamics.net> |
| Message-ID | <7cb5bb01-150f-4a2c-a84e-ae692433c9b0@o30g2000vbu.googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? |
| From | SamTek <rogerjowett@gmail.com> |
On Nov 26, 5:32 am, Ivan Shmakov <oneing...@gmail.com> wrote: > I see that there're a number of derivatives of MS BASIC, > Sinclair BASIC, and STOS BASIC still in active development > (e. g.: QB64, MMBasic; BASin; sdlBasic.) And, as it seems, > there's a renewed interest in smaller, "BASIC-as-an-OS" > computers (check, e. g., Maximite [1] and its derivatives.) > > I wonder if there's a good comparison of their respective > features? I'm especially interested in any of them being > compared to either Beta BASIC (a Sinclair BASIC derivative, > presumably no longer in development), or its derivatives > (SAM BASIC, MasterBASIC.) > > TIA. > > [1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximite > > -- > FSF associate member #7257 i think only bbc basic for the spectrum might stand a chance of using a second processor as a coprocessor though - also its the only one with a built in z80 assembler unfortunately it still doesnt 128 or interlace or +D isciple and certainly doesnt sam coupe external ram above 32,768 for 6mhz what a shame - be ncie if the coprocessor version could handle interface 1 and sam networking or even serial or parallel ports no?
Back to comp.lang.basic.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> - 2012-11-26 12:32 +0700
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? SamTek <rogerjowett@gmail.com> - 2012-11-26 10:05 -0800
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? "Auric__" <not.my.real@email.address> - 2012-11-26 18:47 +0000
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Andrew Owen <aowen10@mail.bbk.ac.uk> - 2012-11-29 00:02 +0000
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> - 2012-12-06 12:53 +0700
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? "news@rtrussell.co.uk" <news@rtrussell.co.uk> - 2012-12-06 09:00 -0800
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Paul Bartlett <bartlett@panix.com> - 2012-12-06 14:40 -0500
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Todd Vargo <tlvargo@sbcglobal.netz> - 2012-12-06 16:17 -0500
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? "news@rtrussell.co.uk" <news@rtrussell.co.uk> - 2012-12-06 14:27 -0800
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.com> - 2012-12-06 17:19 -0600
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? "news@rtrussell.co.uk" <news@rtrussell.co.uk> - 2012-12-07 02:01 -0800
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Todd Vargo <tlvargo@sbcglobal.netz> - 2012-12-07 14:09 -0500
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.com> - 2012-12-07 22:03 -0600
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? "news@rtrussell.co.uk" <news@rtrussell.co.uk> - 2012-12-08 14:52 -0800
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? ppnerkDELETETHIS@yahoo.com (Phred) - 2012-12-12 13:55 +0000
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Todd Vargo <tlvargo@sbcglobal.netz> - 2012-12-06 23:55 -0500
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Paul Bartlett <bartlett@panix.com> - 2012-12-06 20:30 -0500
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Todd Vargo <tlvargo@sbcglobal.netz> - 2012-12-06 23:40 -0500
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> - 2012-12-07 21:05 +0700
csiph-web