Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.basic.misc > #347

Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison?

From Paul Bartlett <bartlett@panix.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.basic.misc, comp.sys.sinclair
Subject Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison?
Date 2012-12-06 20:30 -0500
Organization PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID <alpine.NEB.2.00.1212062022250.6428@panix2.panix.com> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <k968n3$4m1$1@speranza.aioe.org> <86lidbwwtk.fsf@gray.siamics.net> <62d4af2f-931a-4b84-8b2d-8a0e4a8d9e5c@i2g2000pbi.googlegroups.com> <alpine.NEB.2.00.1212061434020.22851@panix2.panix.com> <k9r21s$i4a$1@news.albasani.net>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, 6 Dec 2012, Todd Vargo wrote (trimmed):

> On 12/6/2012 2:40 PM, Paul Bartlett wrote:

>>                                          However, they were/are highly
>> similar, and to the best of my knowledge, it would be legitimate to
>> call QBasic a *slightly* cut down interpreter based on the compiler. I
>> have one encryption / decryption program that I wrote and compiled with
>> QB 4.5 which I still use regularly under Win XP Pro SP3. I haven't
>> tried, but I think it would work under QBasic.

> As far as your encryption program goes, QBasic does not support COMMAND$, so 
> a bit of modification would likely be needed.

That turned out to be easy enough to handle: I didn't use COMMAND$. :)
The program just has prompts.  The net amount of keying would be about
the same, whether the user typed on the command line or in response to
prompts, and in fact using prompts avoided having to parse a command
string.  However, with respect to running it under Win>=98, you have to
use 8.3 paths and filenames, of course.

-- 
Paul Bartlett

Back to comp.lang.basic.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> - 2012-11-26 12:32 +0700
  Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? SamTek <rogerjowett@gmail.com> - 2012-11-26 10:05 -0800
    Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? "Auric__" <not.my.real@email.address> - 2012-11-26 18:47 +0000
  Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Andrew Owen <aowen10@mail.bbk.ac.uk> - 2012-11-29 00:02 +0000
    Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> - 2012-12-06 12:53 +0700
      Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? "news@rtrussell.co.uk" <news@rtrussell.co.uk> - 2012-12-06 09:00 -0800
        Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Paul Bartlett <bartlett@panix.com> - 2012-12-06 14:40 -0500
          Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Todd Vargo <tlvargo@sbcglobal.netz> - 2012-12-06 16:17 -0500
            Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? "news@rtrussell.co.uk" <news@rtrussell.co.uk> - 2012-12-06 14:27 -0800
              Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.com> - 2012-12-06 17:19 -0600
                Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? "news@rtrussell.co.uk" <news@rtrussell.co.uk> - 2012-12-07 02:01 -0800
                Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Todd Vargo <tlvargo@sbcglobal.netz> - 2012-12-07 14:09 -0500
                Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.com> - 2012-12-07 22:03 -0600
                Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? "news@rtrussell.co.uk" <news@rtrussell.co.uk> - 2012-12-08 14:52 -0800
                Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? ppnerkDELETETHIS@yahoo.com (Phred) - 2012-12-12 13:55 +0000
              Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Todd Vargo <tlvargo@sbcglobal.netz> - 2012-12-06 23:55 -0500
            Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Paul Bartlett <bartlett@panix.com> - 2012-12-06 20:30 -0500
              Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Todd Vargo <tlvargo@sbcglobal.netz> - 2012-12-06 23:40 -0500
        Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> - 2012-12-07 21:05 +0700

csiph-web