Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.basic.misc > #351
| From | Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.basic.misc, comp.sys.sinclair |
| Subject | Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? |
| Date | 2012-12-07 21:05 +0700 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <86wqwuufdh.fsf@gray.siamics.net> (permalink) |
| References | <86zk253p5x.fsf@gray.siamics.net> <k968n3$4m1$1@speranza.aioe.org> <86lidbwwtk.fsf@gray.siamics.net> <62d4af2f-931a-4b84-8b2d-8a0e4a8d9e5c@i2g2000pbi.googlegroups.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
>>>>> news@rtrussell co uk <news@rtrussell.co.uk> writes: >>>>> On Dec 6, 5:53 am, Ivan Shmakov <oneing...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Which is v$(n TO m)? > Not sure that this is any more 'advanced' than MID$(v$,n,m-n+1) - > just a different and non-standard syntax. However, it saves a couple of keywords (just a single TO, instead of LEFT$, MID$ and RIGHT$), which should've been important in a BASIC which mapped both characters /and/ keywords to the same set of 256 possible octets. (Also to note is that as an extension, Beta BASIC allowed for the TO syntax to be used on arrays.) Given that I'm musing over the possibility of writing (one more) BASIC interpreter for an MCU, -- either an 8-bit AVR, or an 32-bit ARM, or perhaps both, -- I guess I'd be more interested in following the Sinclair BASIC syntax. (Or should I check if MMBasic can be improved to suit my needs first?) [...] -- FSF associate member #7257
Back to comp.lang.basic.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> - 2012-11-26 12:32 +0700
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? SamTek <rogerjowett@gmail.com> - 2012-11-26 10:05 -0800
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? "Auric__" <not.my.real@email.address> - 2012-11-26 18:47 +0000
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Andrew Owen <aowen10@mail.bbk.ac.uk> - 2012-11-29 00:02 +0000
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> - 2012-12-06 12:53 +0700
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? "news@rtrussell.co.uk" <news@rtrussell.co.uk> - 2012-12-06 09:00 -0800
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Paul Bartlett <bartlett@panix.com> - 2012-12-06 14:40 -0500
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Todd Vargo <tlvargo@sbcglobal.netz> - 2012-12-06 16:17 -0500
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? "news@rtrussell.co.uk" <news@rtrussell.co.uk> - 2012-12-06 14:27 -0800
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.com> - 2012-12-06 17:19 -0600
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? "news@rtrussell.co.uk" <news@rtrussell.co.uk> - 2012-12-07 02:01 -0800
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Todd Vargo <tlvargo@sbcglobal.netz> - 2012-12-07 14:09 -0500
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.com> - 2012-12-07 22:03 -0600
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? "news@rtrussell.co.uk" <news@rtrussell.co.uk> - 2012-12-08 14:52 -0800
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? ppnerkDELETETHIS@yahoo.com (Phred) - 2012-12-12 13:55 +0000
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Todd Vargo <tlvargo@sbcglobal.netz> - 2012-12-06 23:55 -0500
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Paul Bartlett <bartlett@panix.com> - 2012-12-06 20:30 -0500
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Todd Vargo <tlvargo@sbcglobal.netz> - 2012-12-06 23:40 -0500
Re: MS BASIC, Sinclair BASIC, STOS BASIC: derivatives comparison? Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> - 2012-12-07 21:05 +0700
csiph-web