Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.dsp

comp.dsp

33567 articles, 1089 threads (numbers 1075 – 35386) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
“Quefrency” Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2025-06-25 07:02 +0000
 
DDS question: why sine lookup? (50 replies) john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2025-05-06 08:48 -0700
   → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> 2025-05-06 21:00 +0200
     → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2025-05-06 12:33 -0700
     → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> 2025-05-06 16:46 -0400
       → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2025-05-06 15:50 -0700
         → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? Arie de Muijnck <noreply@ademu.nl> 2025-05-07 11:44 +0200
           → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2025-05-07 06:32 -0700
             → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> 2025-05-08 01:58 +1000
       → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2025-05-07 06:55 -0700
         → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> 2025-05-07 11:31 -0400
           → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> 2025-05-08 02:11 +1000
   → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> 2025-05-06 21:27 +0200
     → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? "Don" <g@crcomp.net> 2025-05-06 20:10 +0000
     → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2025-05-06 13:35 -0700
   → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> 2025-05-07 16:27 +1000
   → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> 2025-05-07 20:32 +0100
     → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2025-05-07 13:01 -0700
       → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? bitrex <user@example.net> 2025-05-07 20:27 -0400
         → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2025-05-07 19:21 -0700
           → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> 2025-05-08 22:49 +1000
           → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> 2025-05-08 14:20 -0400
             → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2025-05-08 11:58 -0700
               → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> 2025-05-08 16:24 -0400
                 → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2025-05-08 14:18 -0700
                 → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> 2025-05-08 22:28 +0000
                 → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2025-05-08 16:24 -0700
                 → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> 2025-05-08 23:57 +0000
                 → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> 2025-05-09 04:48 +0000
                 → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2025-05-09 12:53 -0700
                 → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> 2025-05-10 18:53 +1000
                 → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? Lasse Langwadt <llc@fonz.dk> 2025-05-10 19:52 +0200
                 → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2025-05-10 11:53 -0700
                 → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? dplatt@coop.radagast.org (Dave Platt) 2025-05-10 16:50 -0700
                 → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2025-05-10 17:39 -0700
                 → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> 2025-05-11 16:27 -0400
                 → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> 2025-05-11 16:55 +1000
                 → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? Lasse Langwadt <llc@fonz.dk> 2025-05-11 22:03 +0200
                 → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> 2025-05-09 15:52 +1000
         → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2025-05-10 00:44 +0000
       → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> 2025-05-09 09:32 +0100
   → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2025-05-10 17:00 -0700
   → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) 2025-05-13 23:25 +0000
     → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> 2025-05-13 20:22 -0400
       → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2025-05-13 18:40 -0700
       → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) 2025-05-14 15:35 +0000
         → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> 2025-05-14 15:05 -0400
           → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2025-05-14 14:53 -0700
             → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> 2025-05-14 19:16 -0400
               → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> 2025-05-14 17:10 -0700
                 → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> 2025-05-15 12:40 -0400
           → Re: DDS question: why sine lookup? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> 2025-05-15 17:23 +1000
 
So DC motors are obsolete! (11 replies) gyansorova@gmail.com 2017-05-09 12:19 -0700
   → Re: So DC motors are obsolete! bitterlemon40@yahoo.ie 2017-05-09 14:30 -0700
   → Re: So DC motors are obsolete! Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> 2017-05-09 18:17 -0500
     → Re: So DC motors are obsolete! Randy Yates <randyy@garnerundergroundinc.com> 2017-05-12 11:09 -0400
       → Re: So DC motors are obsolete! Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.really> 2017-05-12 13:56 -0500
         → Re: So DC motors are obsolete! eric.jacobsen@ieee.org 2017-05-12 21:23 +0000
           → Re: So DC motors are obsolete! rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> 2017-05-13 12:03 -0400
           → Re: So DC motors are obsolete! robert bristow-johnson <rbj@audioimagination.com> 2017-05-14 21:04 -0700
           → Re: So DC motors are obsolete! Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> 2022-11-16 10:34 -0500
   → Re: So DC motors are obsolete! Steve Underwood <steveu@dis.org> 2017-05-10 11:45 +0800
   → Re: So DC motors are obsolete! Frank Miles <fpm@u.washington.edu> 2017-05-10 16:15 +0000
   → Re: So DC motors are obsolete! herrmannsfeldt@gmail.com 2017-07-18 14:40 -0700
 
Wavelength Dependency in RF Propagation? (11 replies) Randy Yates <yates@digitalsignallabs.com> 2018-05-26 01:40 -0400
   → Re: Wavelength Dependency in RF Propagation? Marcel Mueller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> 2018-05-26 10:12 +0200
     → Re: Wavelength Dependency in RF Propagation? Randy Yates <yates@digitalsignallabs.com> 2018-05-26 14:39 -0400
     → Re: Wavelength Dependency in RF Propagation? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> 2018-05-27 13:25 -0500
       → Re: Wavelength Dependency in RF Propagation? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> 2022-06-03 12:26 -0400
         → Re: Wavelength Dependency in RF Propagation? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> 2022-06-03 12:30 -0400
   → Re: Wavelength Dependency in RF Propagation? boB <boB@K7IQ.com> 2018-05-26 01:27 -0700
   → Re: Wavelength Dependency in RF Propagation? theman@ericjacobsen.org (Eric Jacobsen) 2018-05-26 20:56 +0000
     → Re: Wavelength Dependency in RF Propagation? gyansorova@gmail.com 2018-06-25 11:54 -0700
       → Re: Wavelength Dependency in RF Propagation? theman@ericjacobsen.org (Eric Jacobsen) 2018-06-25 20:59 +0000
         → Re: Wavelength Dependency in RF Propagation? makolber@yahoo.com 2018-06-26 06:16 -0700
   → Re: Wavelength Dependency in RF Propagation? spope384@gmail.com (Steve Pope) 2018-05-26 21:30 +0000
 
Digital Control Applications with the TMS320 Family (1 reply) Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowling@kev009.com> 2022-04-05 12:05 -0700
   → Re: Digital Control Applications with the TMS320 Family boB <boB@K7IQ.com> 2022-04-13 20:40 -0700
 
tools for processing radio-signals kristoff <kristoff@skypro.be> 2022-01-14 17:46 +0100
 
Distributed PDM decimating filter Piotr Wyderski <bombald@protonmail.com> 2022-01-02 22:28 +0100
 
Current ASICs (1 reply) Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowling@kev009.com> 2021-12-19 16:19 -0700
   → Re: Current ASICs Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> 2021-12-30 15:21 -0500
 
Why is this group dead? (15 replies) blocher@columbus.rr.com 2020-08-10 03:27 -0700
   → Re: Why is this group dead? Karan Gurtu <karan.gurtu@gmail.com> 2020-08-10 16:27 -0700
   → Re: Why is this group dead? Benjamin Couillard <benjamin.couillard@gmail.com> 2020-08-11 07:47 -0700
     → Re: Why is this group dead? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> 2020-10-02 14:16 -0700
       → Re: Why is this group dead? boB <boB@K7IQ.com> 2020-10-02 21:05 -0700
     → Re: Why is this group dead? Greg Berchin <gjberchin@charter.net> 2020-10-06 12:11 -0700
       → Re: Why is this group dead? boB <boB@K7IQ.com> 2020-10-07 00:09 -0700
       → Re: Why is this group dead? dvsarwate <dvsarwate@yahoo.com> 2020-10-20 20:27 -0700
       → Re: Why is this group dead? Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> 2020-11-15 10:20 -0800
       → Re: Why is this group dead? robert bristow-johnson <rbj@audioimagination.com> 2020-12-22 23:02 -0800
         → Re: Why is this group dead? boB <boB@K7IQ.com> 2020-12-23 21:30 -0800
         → Re: Why is this group dead? Greg Berchin <gjberchin@charter.net> 2020-12-25 06:22 -0800
           → Re: Why is this group dead? "ga...@u.washington.edu" <gah4@u.washington.edu> 2020-12-27 20:32 -0800
           → Re: Why is this group dead? Randy Yates <yates@digitalsignallabs.com> 2021-08-31 19:00 -0400
   → Re: Why is this group dead? "ga...@u.washington.edu" <gah4@u.washington.edu> 2020-08-11 18:59 -0700
   → Re: Why is this group dead? "ga...@u.washington.edu" <gah4@u.washington.edu> 2020-10-03 06:52 -0700
 
why did Google Groups drop comp.dsp? Doctor Louis Pasteur <noemail@olddays.com> 2021-07-30 19:01 +0800
 
Recovering one irregular signal in the presence of another stronger one--_in utero_ pulse ox (3 replies) Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> 2021-06-06 14:38 -0400
   → Re: Recovering one irregular signal in the presence of another stronger one--_in utero_ pulse ox Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> 2021-06-06 14:45 -0400
     → Re: Recovering one irregular signal in the presence of another stronger one--_in utero_ pulse ox boB <boB@K7IQ.com> 2021-06-10 22:53 -0700
       → Re: Recovering one irregular signal in the presence of another stronger one--_in utero_ pulse ox Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> 2021-06-11 10:20 -0400
 
Recovering one irregular signal in the presence of another stronger one--*in utero* pulse ox (6 replies) Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> 2021-05-18 18:31 -0400
   → Re: Recovering one irregular signal in the presence of another stronger one--*in utero* pulse ox theman@ericjacobsen.org (Eric Jacobsen) 2021-05-18 22:50 +0000
     → Re: Recovering one irregular signal in the presence of another stronger one--*in utero* pulse ox Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> 2021-05-18 19:16 -0400
   → Re: Recovering one irregular signal in the presence of another stronger one--*in utero* pulse ox Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> 2021-05-19 07:37 +0200
     → Re: Recovering one irregular signal in the presence of another stronger one--*in utero* pulse ox Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> 2021-05-19 11:31 -0400
   → Re: Recovering one irregular signal in the presence of another stronger one--*in utero* pulse ox Les Cargill <lcargil99@gmail.com> 2021-05-30 21:14 -0500
     → Re: Recovering one irregular signal in the presence of another stronger one--*in utero* pulse ox Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> 2021-06-02 12:39 -0400
 
I can post just fine, you moron (3 replies) John Doe <always.look@message.header> 2021-01-29 18:08 +0000
   → Re: I can post just fine, you moron Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll> 2021-01-29 19:38 +0100
     → Re: I can post just fine, you moron John Doe <always.look@message.header> 2021-01-30 06:46 +0000
     → Re: I can post just fine, you moron John Doe <always.look@message.header> 2021-01-30 06:48 +0000
 
Re: É DA ARRESTARE L'AVVOCATO INCULA E SGOZZA BAMBINI DANIELE MINOTTI DI CRIMINALE STUDIO LEGALE LISI! É DA ARRESTARE L'AVVOCATO SATANISTA, NAZISTA, SATANAZISTA, PEDOFILO, OMICIDA DANIELE MINOTTI DI RAPALLO, GENOVA E CRIMINALISSIMO STUDIO LEGALE LUIGI ROTUNNO GRUPO LA TORRE-IMOPLANET <megliomortochearreso@protonmail.com> 2020-12-29 11:43 -0800
 
É PEDOFILO ASSASSINO L'AVVOCATO DANIELE MINOTTI DI CRIMINALE STUDIO LEGALE LISI! LORENZO PIACENTINI LAZARD MILAN <riccardo.barrai@protonmail.com> 2020-12-29 11:20 -0800
 
É PEDOFILO E KILLER: PAOLO BARRAI! IL CRIMINALE LEGHISTA LUCA SOSTEGNI, ARRESTATO, SCAPPAVA A PORTO SEGURO (BR), DOVE L'OMICIDA PAOLO BARRAI HA LAVATO PARTE DEI 49 MLN € RUBATI DA LEGA LADRONA! VÁ RI ARRESTATO (GIÁ STATO IN CARCERE 3 VOLTE)! FABIO VENZI-GRAN MAESTRO GLRI <patrickadams.discojuice@outlook.com> 2020-12-12 09:19 -0800
 
Variance of white noise (5 replies) Tom Killwhang <gyansorova@gmail.com> 2020-09-27 20:38 -0700
   → Re: Variance of white noise Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> 2020-10-08 14:33 -0400
     → Re: Variance of white noise Les Cargill <lcargil99@gmail.com> 2020-10-09 21:01 -0500
       → Re: Variance of white noise Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> 2020-10-10 13:24 -0400
         → Re: Variance of white noise Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> 2020-10-10 13:27 -0400
       → Re: Variance of white noise spope384@gmail.com (Steve Pope) 2020-12-03 21:12 +0000
 
BCH Encoding/Decoding (1 reply) Randy Yates <yates@digitalsignallabs.com> 2020-11-24 17:20 -0500
   → Re: BCH Encoding/Decoding spope384@gmail.com (Steve Pope) 2020-11-28 04:27 +0000
 
É PEDOFILO ASSASSINO: PAOLO BARRAI DI CRIMINALE TERRABITCOIN, TELEGRAM E BITCOIN! LUIGI ROTUNNO LA TORRE RESORT ALL INCLUSIVE <jennypipenny6@mail.com> 2020-11-24 12:38 -0800
 
delta-sigma ADC in FPGA (11 replies) Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> 2020-11-15 19:27 -0800
   → Re: delta-sigma ADC in FPGA Yes there are times when the (difference/sum) ratio is a life-saver.For example, when the sum is varying FAST over a wide range. navaide <navaide@gmail.com> 2020-11-16 18:31 -0800
   → Re: delta-sigma ADC in FPGA Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> 2020-11-18 15:07 -0800
     → Re: delta-sigma ADC in FPGA boB <boB@K7IQ.com> 2020-11-18 20:15 -0800
       → Re: delta-sigma ADC in FPGA Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> 2020-11-19 11:44 -0800
         → Re: delta-sigma ADC in FPGA boB <boB@K7IQ.com> 2020-11-20 02:01 -0800
           → Re: delta-sigma ADC in FPGA Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> 2020-11-20 13:52 -0800
             → Re: delta-sigma ADC in FPGA boB <boB@K7IQ.com> 2020-11-20 18:00 -0800
               → Re: delta-sigma ADC in FPGA Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> 2020-11-20 22:02 -0800
                 → Re: delta-sigma ADC in FPGA boB <boB@K7IQ.com> 2020-11-21 01:58 -0800
   → Re: delta-sigma ADC in FPGA Rafael Deliano <rafael_deliano@arcor.de> 2020-11-22 10:24 +0100
     → Re: delta-sigma ADC in FPGA Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> 2020-11-22 15:10 -0800

~Page 1 of ~184 (articles 35297–35386) Older →


csiph-web