Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.dsp > #35334

Re: So DC motors are obsolete!

From Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net>
Newsgroups comp.dsp
Subject Re: So DC motors are obsolete!
Date 2022-11-16 10:34 -0500
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <aeb1bba4-b8c3-6a7f-f61c-e142b19b225e@electrooptical.net> (permalink)
References <f978d0c9-5401-445b-8a77-5007a51baafc@googlegroups.com> <YL-dnS-eb5aR04_EnZ2dnUU7-cednZ2d@giganews.com> <87lgq21595.fsf@garnerundergroundinc.com> <FMednUHBzJzvmIvEnZ2dnUU7-cmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <5916266e.155090140@news.eternal-september.org>

Show all headers | View raw


eric.jacobsen@ieee.org wrote:
> On Fri, 12 May 2017 13:56:50 -0500, Tim Wescott
> <tim@seemywebsite.really> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 12 May 2017 11:09:26 -0400, Randy Yates wrote:
>>
>>> Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> writes:
>>>> [...]
>>>> I think that itty bitty brushed motors will be around for a while, at
>>>> least until people figure out how to make itty bitty controllers that
>>>> are cheaper than itty bitty brushes and commutators.
>>>
>>> Too funny! Tim, was the term "itty bitty" used in your graduate
>>> textbooks?
>>
>> No.  But it should have been.
>>
>> I couple of decades ago I realized, thanks to a colleague with a PhD,
>> that "bazzilion", "ginormous", "teeny", etc., are all valid technical
>> terms (meaning, in order, roughly, and in most contexcts, "so many that
>> it's not cost effective to enumerate", "so big that it's not cost
>> effective to consider the size", and "so small that it's not cost
>> effective to consider the size").
>>
> 
> There are measurement units that are commonly used to convey similar
> meaning, .e.g., "buttloads", "shit-ton", etc.   I've accepted these,
> and many other, as legitimate technical terms or units of measurement
> for a long time.   They seem to be nearly universally accepted, so it
> has been neither problematic nor controversial in my experience.

Remember Mars Climate Orbiter and the Gimli Glider.  You have to specify 
if it's a metric buttload or an avordupois buttload.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs


-- 
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

http://electrooptical.net
http://hobbs-eo.com

Back to comp.dsp | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

Re: So DC motors are obsolete! Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2022-11-16 10:34 -0500

csiph-web