Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.databases.postgresql > #163
| From | Mladen Gogala <no@email.here.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.databases.postgresql |
| Subject | Re: Is PostgreSQL good? |
| Date | 2011-06-29 21:38 +0000 |
| Organization | solani.org |
| Message-ID | <pan.2011.06.29.21.38.06@email.here.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <1309166263.561072@proxy.dienste.wien.at> <pan.2011.06.28.06.11.21@gmail.com> <1309250071.981133@proxy.dienste.wien.at> <pan.2011.06.28.13.30.33@gmail.com> <1309333854.777629@proxy.dienste.wien.at> |
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:50:32 +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote: > All but the third of these points are not about technical merits. > > #1 is philosophy. I'd agree that humans are smarter than machines in > principle, but I wouldn't enter a number crunching contest with one. Nor > do I personally want to enter a query optimizing contest with > PostgreSQL's optimizer. Well, I have no compunction about doing the latter. However, no choice is given. That's the problem. > > #2 is an opinion. What should I answer? You should let me know whether you think that there are situations in which hints are required and if not, why not? The designers of all other major RDBMS systems seem to disagree here. > > #4 sounds like a conspiracy theory. No, it doesn't. It's a rightful impression. Refusal to give users a choice and requirement to post to the list is completely ludicrous. Now, had I said that PostgreSQL is intentionally kept relatively useless, so that business users have to either buy a commercial product or hire consultants, that would be a conspiracy theory. However, I didn't say that. All I said is that refusal to provide hints based on arguments that the optimizer is smarter than the users is rude and reflects deep mistrust toward the users of the software. > > I agree with #3 as far that a database must offer tools for tuning. I > have named some that PostgreSQL has. Query tuning is always a bit of an > art, don't pretend that there's a step-by-step foolproof method in > Oracle. I may look like that to you because you know it well. Actually, there is a foolproof method in Oracle. You see where the time is spent and you address the problem. That is what the wait event interface is all about. And it's by no means an art form. > No, I meant be heard by people who post here to get advice and opinions > on migrating from Oracle to PostgreSQL. Oh, I'll take care of that myself. I'll make myself heard, don't worry. -- http://mgogala.byethost5.com
Back to comp.databases.postgresql | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
migrating oracle to postgres Username <user@domain.tld> - 2011-06-20 19:28 +0200
Re: migrating oracle to postgres Mladen Gogala <no@email.here.invalid> - 2011-06-20 20:08 +0000
Re: migrating oracle to postgres Username <user@domain.tld> - 2011-06-20 23:45 +0200
Re: migrating oracle to postgres Mladen Gogala <no@email.here.invalid> - 2011-06-20 22:37 +0000
Re: migrating oracle to postgres Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 02:01 +0000
Re: migrating oracle to postgres "Laurenz Albe" <invite@spam.to.invalid> - 2011-06-21 09:18 +0200
Re: migrating oracle to postgres Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 13:38 +0000
Is PostgreSQL good? (was: migrating oracle to postgres) "Laurenz Albe" <invite@spam.to.invalid> - 2011-06-22 12:30 +0200
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? Harry Tuttle <OTPXDAJCSJVU@spammotel.com> - 2011-06-22 13:15 +0200
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? (was: migrating oracle to postgres) Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen@gmail.com> - 2011-06-22 12:02 +0000
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2011-06-22 21:52 +0200
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? Mladen Gogala <no@email.here.invalid> - 2011-06-22 22:43 +0000
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? (was: migrating oracle to postgres) "Laurenz Albe" <invite@spam.to.invalid> - 2011-06-24 12:29 +0200
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? Hans Castorp <REWYRLXHEGHO@spammotel.com> - 2011-06-24 12:57 +0200
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? "Laurenz Albe" <invite@spam.to.invalid> - 2011-06-24 14:53 +0200
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? Mladen Gogala <no@email.here.invalid> - 2011-06-24 16:32 +0000
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? (was: migrating oracle to postgres) Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen@gmail.com> - 2011-06-24 13:53 +0000
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? (was: migrating oracle to postgres) "Laurenz Albe" <invite@spam.to.invalid> - 2011-06-27 11:17 +0200
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? (was: migrating oracle to postgres) Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen@gmail.com> - 2011-06-28 06:11 +0000
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? "Laurenz Albe" <invite@spam.to.invalid> - 2011-06-28 10:34 +0200
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen@gmail.com> - 2011-06-28 13:30 +0000
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? "Laurenz Albe" <invite@spam.to.invalid> - 2011-06-29 09:50 +0200
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? Mladen Gogala <no@email.here.invalid> - 2011-06-29 21:38 +0000
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? "Laurenz Albe" <invite@spam.to.invalid> - 2011-06-30 09:14 +0200
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? Mladen Gogala <mgogala@no.address.invalid> - 2011-06-30 13:22 +0000
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? Don Y <nowhere@here.com> - 2011-06-30 07:05 -0700
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? Mladen Gogala <no@email.here.invalid> - 2011-06-30 15:41 +0000
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2011-06-30 16:49 +0100
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? Mladen Gogala <no@email.here.invalid> - 2011-06-30 19:24 +0000
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? Don Y <nowhere@here.com> - 2011-06-30 13:21 -0700
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? Mladen Gogala <no@email.here.invalid> - 2011-06-30 22:42 +0000
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? Don Y <nowhere@here.com> - 2011-07-01 11:57 -0700
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen@gmail.com> - 2011-07-01 22:58 +0000
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2011-07-01 14:07 +0100
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen@gmail.com> - 2011-07-01 13:29 +0000
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? Don Y <nowhere@here.com> - 2011-06-30 13:17 -0700
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen@gmail.com> - 2011-06-30 23:53 +0000
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? "Laurenz Albe" <invite@spam.to.invalid> - 2011-07-01 10:13 +0200
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen@gmail.com> - 2011-07-01 13:38 +0000
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? "Laurenz Albe" <invite@spam.to.invalid> - 2011-07-01 16:58 +0200
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? Mladen Gogala <no@email.here.invalid> - 2011-07-01 15:33 +0000
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? Don Y <nowhere@here.com> - 2011-07-01 11:39 -0700
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? "Laurenz Albe" <invite@spam.to.invalid> - 2011-07-04 16:39 +0200
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? Don Y <nowhere@here.com> - 2011-07-04 12:11 -0700
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? "Laurenz Albe" <invite@spam.to.invalid> - 2011-07-05 08:58 +0200
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? Don Y <nowhere@here.com> - 2011-07-05 11:29 -0700
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? "Laurenz Albe" <invite@spam.to.invalid> - 2011-07-06 09:00 +0200
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? Don Y <nowhere@here.com> - 2011-07-06 01:00 -0700
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? "Laurenz Albe" <invite@spam.to.invalid> - 2011-07-07 09:05 +0200
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? Don Y <nowhere@here.com> - 2011-07-07 00:34 -0700
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? Matthew Woodcraft <mattheww@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2011-07-04 20:12 +0100
Re: Is PostgreSQL good? Don Y <nowhere@here.com> - 2011-07-04 12:24 -0700
Re: migrating oracle to postgres Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-23 17:48 +0200
Re: migrating oracle to postgres Mladen Gogala <no@email.here.invalid> - 2011-06-23 16:42 +0000
Re: migrating oracle to postgres Mladen Gogala <no@email.here.invalid> - 2011-06-23 18:57 +0000
Re: migrating oracle to postgres Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-26 17:35 +0200
Re: migrating oracle to postgres Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen@gmail.com> - 2011-06-26 19:08 +0000
Re: migrating oracle to postgres Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-27 00:32 -0700
Re: migrating oracle to postgres Mladen Gogala <no@email.here.invalid> - 2011-06-28 16:00 +0000
Re: migrating oracle to postgres Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-28 22:28 +0200
csiph-web