Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #3378
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!nerds-end |
|---|---|
| From | Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> |
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different |
| Date | Fri, 10 Feb 2023 19:11:31 +0100 |
| Organization | Compilers Central |
| Sender | johnl@iecc.com |
| Approved | comp.compilers@iecc.com |
| Message-ID | <23-02-037@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <23-01-092@comp.compilers> <23-02-003@comp.compilers> <23-02-019@comp.compilers> <23-02-025@comp.compilers> <23-02-026@comp.compilers> <23-02-029@comp.compilers> <23-02-033@comp.compilers> |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Injection-Info | gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="44892"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com" |
| Keywords | arithmetic, comment |
| Posted-Date | 10 Feb 2023 13:18:46 EST |
| X-submission-address | compilers@iecc.com |
| X-moderator-address | compilers-request@iecc.com |
| X-FAQ-and-archives | http://compilers.iecc.com |
| In-Reply-To | <23-02-033@comp.compilers> |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.compilers:3378 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 2/8/23 11:19 AM, Anton Ertl wrote: > With a ones-complement or two's-complement mantissa the hidden bit > would just have the same sign as the sign bit, so this trick is not > tied to sign-magnitude representation. Please explain the provenience or purpose of that hidden bit with integral numbers. How can integral values be *normalized* so that a previously required bit can be hidden? Sign extension to a higher number of bits does not increase the value or accuracy of an integral number. DoDi [He said "mantissa", so it's floating point. I've certainly seen scaled integer arithmetic, but normalized integers other than +/- zero in systems with signed zeros seems unlikely. -John]
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Are there different programming languages that are compiled to the same intermediate language? Martin Ward <mwardgkc@gmail.com> - 2023-01-31 14:04 +0000
Re: Are there different programming languages that are compiled to the same intermediate language? arnold@freefriends.org (Aharon Robbins) - 2023-02-01 08:07 +0000
Re: Software proofs, was Are there different programming languages that are compiled to the same intermediate language? Spiros Bousbouras <spibou@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 15:14 +0000
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 16:14 -0800
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-06 13:26 -0800
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2023-02-07 14:31 +0100
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-08 01:10 -0800
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-09 00:26 -0800
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-11 00:01 -0800
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different drb@ihatespam.msu.edu (Dennis Boone) - 2023-02-12 04:37 +0000
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2023-02-08 10:19 +0000
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2023-02-10 19:11 +0100
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-10 23:47 -0800
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2023-02-11 22:34 +0000
Re: old floating point, C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-11 22:48 -0800
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2023-02-08 15:24 +0100
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-09 00:37 -0800
csiph-web