Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #3356
| From | arnold@freefriends.org (Aharon Robbins) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: Are there different programming languages that are compiled to the same intermediate language? |
| Date | 2023-02-01 08:07 +0000 |
| Organization | non |
| Message-ID | <23-02-003@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <23-01-092@comp.compilers> |
I've never understood this. Isn't there a chicken and egg problem? How do we know that the theorem prover is correct and bug free? I ask in all seriousness. Thanks, Arnold In article <23-01-092@comp.compilers>, Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> wrote: >On 30/01/2023 10:00, John Levine wrote: >> [Remember that while the halting problem is insoluble in general, it's >> often soluble in specific cases, e.g. "halt" or "foo: goto foo". > >More usefully, there are methods for transforming a formal >specification into an executable implementation which >preserve semantic equivalence, and therefore are guaranteed >to produce a terminating program (for input states for which >the specification is defined). ... [It's a perfectly reasonable question. Alan Perlis, who was my thesis advisor, never saw any reason to believe that a thousand line proof was any more likely to be bug-free than a thousand line program. -John]
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Are there different programming languages that are compiled to the same intermediate language? Martin Ward <mwardgkc@gmail.com> - 2023-01-31 14:04 +0000
Re: Are there different programming languages that are compiled to the same intermediate language? arnold@freefriends.org (Aharon Robbins) - 2023-02-01 08:07 +0000
Re: Software proofs, was Are there different programming languages that are compiled to the same intermediate language? Spiros Bousbouras <spibou@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 15:14 +0000
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 16:14 -0800
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-06 13:26 -0800
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2023-02-07 14:31 +0100
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-08 01:10 -0800
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-09 00:26 -0800
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-11 00:01 -0800
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different drb@ihatespam.msu.edu (Dennis Boone) - 2023-02-12 04:37 +0000
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2023-02-08 10:19 +0000
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2023-02-10 19:11 +0100
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-10 23:47 -0800
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2023-02-11 22:34 +0000
Re: old floating point, C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-11 22:48 -0800
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2023-02-08 15:24 +0100
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-09 00:37 -0800
csiph-web