Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different

From	gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu>
Newsgroups	comp.compilers
Subject	Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different
Date	2023-02-09 00:37 -0800
Organization	Compilers Central
Message-ID	<23-02-036@comp.compilers> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <23-02-019@comp.compilers> <23-02-025@comp.compilers> <23-02-026@comp.compilers> <23-02-029@comp.compilers> <23-02-034@comp.compilers>

Show all headers | View raw

On Wednesday, February 8, 2023 at 8:50:19 AM UTC-8, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:

(snip)

> That's correct, the inprecise representation of FP numbers allows for
> such tricks. The hidden bit trick can be used again with the FP
> exponents, as I outlined in my Dynamic Floating Point Exponents proposal

To continue discussion about OoO and the 360/91, S/360 specifies
floating point divide with a truncated quotient.   The 91 uses a
Newton-Raphson divide algorithm, using its high-speed multiplier,
to generate a rounded quotient.

Along with imprecise interrupts, that is on the list of incompatibilities
with other S/360 models.

As for hidden bit, S/360 uses base 16 floating point, so no hidden bit.
[I actually programmed a /91 in Fortran, so, yeah. -John]

Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Are there different programming languages that are compiled to the same intermediate language? Martin Ward <mwardgkc@gmail.com> - 2023-01-31 14:04 +0000
  Re: Are there different programming languages that are compiled to the same intermediate language? arnold@freefriends.org (Aharon Robbins) - 2023-02-01 08:07 +0000
    Re: Software proofs, was Are there different programming languages that are compiled to the same intermediate language? Spiros Bousbouras <spibou@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 15:14 +0000
      Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 16:14 -0800
        Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-06 13:26 -0800
          Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2023-02-07 14:31 +0100
            Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-08 01:10 -0800
              Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-09 00:26 -0800
                Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-11 00:01 -0800
                Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different drb@ihatespam.msu.edu (Dennis Boone) - 2023-02-12 04:37 +0000
            Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2023-02-08 10:19 +0000
              Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2023-02-10 19:11 +0100
                Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-10 23:47 -0800
                Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2023-02-11 22:34 +0000
                Re: old floating point, C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-11 22:48 -0800
            Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2023-02-08 15:24 +0100
              Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-09 00:37 -0800

csiph-web