Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #3376
| From | gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different |
| Date | 2023-02-09 00:26 -0800 |
| Organization | Compilers Central |
| Message-ID | <23-02-035@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <23-02-019@comp.compilers> <23-02-025@comp.compilers> <23-02-026@comp.compilers> <23-02-029@comp.compilers> <23-02-032@comp.compilers> |
On Wednesday, February 8, 2023 at 8:48:23 AM UTC-8, gah4 wrote: (snip) > Well, I have been wondering for years when we get a C compiler > for the 7090 so we can test out sign-magnitude integers. > I think the 7090 does 16 bit integers, at least that is what > its Fortran compilers did, stored in 36 bit words. (snip) > [The 704x/709x series did 36 bit sign-magnitude arithmetic. Fortran > integers were limited to 15 bits plus a sign, probably because that > was the size of addresses, and they expected integer arithmetic to > be used only for counting and subscripts. In 709 Fortran II they > expanded them to 17 bits, in 7090 Fortran IV they were finally a > full word. -John] OK, so 7090 C can use all 36 bits. When we get one. I just remembered that the S/360 emulation to develop OS/360 was done on the 7090. 36 bits would help! It was the 15 bit integers on the 704 that gave us five digit statement numbers in Fortran, originally 1 to 32767, and (not much) later extended to 99999. And over 60 years later, we still have 99999. But also, the 704 Fortran, and I believe still the 7090, indexes arrays from the end of memory toward the beginning. [It did because for reasons I have never been able to figure out, the 70x series subtracted rather than added the contents of an index register to get the effective address. -John]
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Are there different programming languages that are compiled to the same intermediate language? Martin Ward <mwardgkc@gmail.com> - 2023-01-31 14:04 +0000
Re: Are there different programming languages that are compiled to the same intermediate language? arnold@freefriends.org (Aharon Robbins) - 2023-02-01 08:07 +0000
Re: Software proofs, was Are there different programming languages that are compiled to the same intermediate language? Spiros Bousbouras <spibou@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 15:14 +0000
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 16:14 -0800
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-06 13:26 -0800
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2023-02-07 14:31 +0100
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-08 01:10 -0800
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-09 00:26 -0800
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-11 00:01 -0800
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different drb@ihatespam.msu.edu (Dennis Boone) - 2023-02-12 04:37 +0000
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2023-02-08 10:19 +0000
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2023-02-10 19:11 +0100
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-10 23:47 -0800
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2023-02-11 22:34 +0000
Re: old floating point, C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-11 22:48 -0800
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2023-02-08 15:24 +0100
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-09 00:37 -0800
csiph-web