Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #304
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.iecc.com!lnews.iecc.com!nerds-end |
|---|---|
| From | Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions |
| Date | Mon, 31 Oct 2011 17:08:54 +0000 (UTC) |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 27 |
| Sender | news@iecc.com |
| Approved | comp.compilers@iecc.com |
| Message-ID | <11-11-002@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <11-10-019@comp.compilers> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | lnews.iecc.com |
| X-Trace | gal.iecc.com 1320177574 30567 64.57.183.34 (1 Nov 2011 19:59:34 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@iecc.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Tue, 1 Nov 2011 19:59:34 +0000 (UTC) |
| Keywords | optimize |
| Posted-Date | 01 Nov 2011 15:59:34 EDT |
| X-submission-address | compilers@iecc.com |
| X-moderator-address | compilers-request@iecc.com |
| X-FAQ-and-archives | http://compilers.iecc.com |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.compilers:304 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 2011-10-31, Amker.Cheng <amker.cheng@gmail.com> wrote: > I found following intermediate codes are generated in gcc > > rx <- 0 > ... > use rx > ... > ry <- 0 > use ry > ... > > It's normally a result of const propagation. > After register allocation, It is likely rx/ry get allocated into > different hard registers. > Thus in final codes, there would be a redundant "move 0" instruction. Surely you mean, if they get allocated into the SAME register, there will be a redundant initialization? > The story even stands for Os compiling, so the question is: > Is there any optimization technique dedicates to this kind of case? It's a variant of ``common subexpression elimination''. This should be done early on. You have two different instances of 0 in the code, which should be recognized as a common subexpression, sharing the same intermediate code, and virtual registers.
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions "Amker.Cheng" <amker.cheng@gmail.com> - 2011-10-31 17:53 +0800
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2011-10-31 17:08 +0000
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions amker <can.finner@gmail.com> - 2011-11-01 19:01 -0700
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions mac <acolvin@efunct.com> - 2011-11-03 02:20 +0000
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2011-11-01 14:32 -0400
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2011-11-01 22:35 +0000
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions amker <can.finner@gmail.com> - 2011-11-01 19:35 -0700
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions amker <amker.cheng@gmail.com> - 2011-11-01 21:04 -0700
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2011-11-02 12:38 -0400
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2011-11-03 03:20 +0000
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2011-11-04 13:27 -0400
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2011-11-04 21:19 +0000
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2011-11-03 03:32 +0000
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions amker <can.finner@gmail.com> - 2011-11-01 19:21 -0700
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2011-11-04 17:26 -0400
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions amker <amker.cheng@gmail.com> - 2011-11-07 17:33 -0800
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions Wei-Jen Chen <chenwj@cs.NCTU.edu.tw> - 2011-11-10 08:04 +0000
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2011-11-10 18:18 -0500
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions amker <amker.cheng@gmail.com> - 2011-11-01 20:58 -0700
csiph-web