Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #301
| From | "Amker.Cheng" <amker.cheng@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions |
| Date | 2011-10-31 17:53 +0800 |
| Organization | Compilers Central |
| Message-ID | <11-10-019@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
Hi, I found following intermediate codes are generated in gcc rx <- 0 ... use rx ... ry <- 0 use ry ... It's normally a result of const propagation. After register allocation, It is likely rx/ry get allocated into different hard registers. Thus in final codes, there would be a redundant "move 0" instruction. The story even stands for Os compiling, so the question is: Is there any optimization technique dedicates to this kind of case? Or is it normally handled by other optimizations as sub task? Thanks very much. -- Best Regards.
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions "Amker.Cheng" <amker.cheng@gmail.com> - 2011-10-31 17:53 +0800
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2011-10-31 17:08 +0000
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions amker <can.finner@gmail.com> - 2011-11-01 19:01 -0700
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions mac <acolvin@efunct.com> - 2011-11-03 02:20 +0000
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2011-11-01 14:32 -0400
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2011-11-01 22:35 +0000
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions amker <can.finner@gmail.com> - 2011-11-01 19:35 -0700
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions amker <amker.cheng@gmail.com> - 2011-11-01 21:04 -0700
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2011-11-02 12:38 -0400
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2011-11-03 03:20 +0000
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2011-11-04 13:27 -0400
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2011-11-04 21:19 +0000
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2011-11-03 03:32 +0000
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions amker <can.finner@gmail.com> - 2011-11-01 19:21 -0700
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2011-11-04 17:26 -0400
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions amker <amker.cheng@gmail.com> - 2011-11-07 17:33 -0800
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions Wei-Jen Chen <chenwj@cs.NCTU.edu.tw> - 2011-11-10 08:04 +0000
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2011-11-10 18:18 -0500
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions amker <amker.cheng@gmail.com> - 2011-11-01 20:58 -0700
csiph-web