Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #310
| From | amker <can.finner@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions |
| Date | 2011-11-01 19:35 -0700 |
| Organization | Compilers Central |
| Message-ID | <11-11-008@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <11-10-019@comp.compilers> <11-11-004@comp.compilers> <11-11-005@comp.compilers> |
On Nov 2, 6:35 am, glen herrmannsfeldt <g...@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote: > George Neuner <gneun...@comcast.net> wrote: > > (big snip on optimization and register loads) > > That is what register renaming is for. Usually using more than > the architecturally specified number of registers, the CPU > internally remaps the registers such that it can keep one value > in a register while an instruction is being executed out of order. > > This is especially important for IA32, with so few registers, > and for S/360 and S/370 floating point, again with few registers. Well, for my original case, I mean optimize the codes rx <- 0 ... use rx ... ry <- 0 <----which is redundant and can be removed use ry into rx <- 0 ... use rx ... use rx <----------------- In this case, the 2nd 'use rx' instruction introduces true dependency on "rx <- 0", So register renaming won't help here, right? Thanks
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions "Amker.Cheng" <amker.cheng@gmail.com> - 2011-10-31 17:53 +0800
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2011-10-31 17:08 +0000
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions amker <can.finner@gmail.com> - 2011-11-01 19:01 -0700
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions mac <acolvin@efunct.com> - 2011-11-03 02:20 +0000
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2011-11-01 14:32 -0400
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2011-11-01 22:35 +0000
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions amker <can.finner@gmail.com> - 2011-11-01 19:35 -0700
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions amker <amker.cheng@gmail.com> - 2011-11-01 21:04 -0700
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2011-11-02 12:38 -0400
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2011-11-03 03:20 +0000
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2011-11-04 13:27 -0400
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2011-11-04 21:19 +0000
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2011-11-03 03:32 +0000
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions amker <can.finner@gmail.com> - 2011-11-01 19:21 -0700
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2011-11-04 17:26 -0400
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions amker <amker.cheng@gmail.com> - 2011-11-07 17:33 -0800
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions Wei-Jen Chen <chenwj@cs.NCTU.edu.tw> - 2011-11-10 08:04 +0000
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2011-11-10 18:18 -0500
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions amker <amker.cheng@gmail.com> - 2011-11-01 20:58 -0700
csiph-web