Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.ai.shells > #229
| From | occam <occam@nowhere.nix> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.ai.shells |
| Subject | Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling |
| Date | 2023-05-19 08:17 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <kcoijlFlls6U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <20230518182614.4718a0373c61b6867a4dd7ea@none.net> <1qayaze.102hure1t9r4cuN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
On 19/05/2023 01:19, Sn!pe wrote:
> Nic <Nic@none.net> wrote:
>
>> If a computer can fool 70% of judges in a five-minute conversation into
>> thinking it's a person, the computer passes the test. Would passing the
>> Turing test – something which now seems imminent – show that an AI has
>> achieved thought and understanding?
>>
>> From
>> <https://theconversation.com/chatgpt-cant-think-consciousness-is-something-entirely-different-to-todays-ai-204823>
>>
>> I invite all serious posters to participate.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Nic <Nic@none.net>
>
> Your .sig separator is broken.
You should be aware that it is not only Nic's separator that is broken.
Nic is broken - has been for a long while. ('Nic' is short for
'nincompoop'.)
<snip>
>
> Re: your question:
> Does consciousness imply independent self-awareness?
That was not his question. His (implied) question was 'Is passing the
Turing Test the same as having consciousness and awareness?'
No, and no. There is a large chasm between 'pretending to be a human in
conversation' and 'self-awareness'. I blame author of the article for
journalistic sensationalism.
Back to comp.ai.shells | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling Nic <Nic@none.net> - 2023-05-18 18:26 -0400
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-05-19 00:19 +0100
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2023-05-19 06:54 +0100
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-05-19 10:59 +0100
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2023-05-27 09:25 +0000
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-05-27 10:57 +0100
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> - 2023-05-19 07:34 -0500
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2023-05-27 08:16 +0000
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-05-27 09:46 +0100
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2023-05-19 08:17 +0200
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-05-19 10:59 +0100
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2023-05-27 08:23 +0000
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2023-05-27 08:38 +0000
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-05-27 10:01 +0100
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2023-05-27 10:05 +0000
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-05-27 11:34 +0100
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-05-27 09:45 +0100
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluemanedhawk@gmail.com> - 2023-05-21 00:11 -0400
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-05-21 05:15 +0100
csiph-web