Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.ai.shells > #241
| From | vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling |
| Newsgroups | comp.ai.shells |
| References | <20230518182614.4718a0373c61b6867a4dd7ea@none.net> <1qayaze.102hure1t9r4cuN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| Message-ID | <k6jcM.451375$rKDc.81335@fx34.iad> (permalink) |
| Organization | blocknews - www.blocknews.net |
| Date | 2023-05-27 08:23 +0000 |
On Fri, 19 May 2023 00:19:23 +0100, Sn!pe wrote: > Nic <Nic@none.net> wrote: > >> If a computer can fool 70% of judges in a five-minute conversation into >> thinking it's a person, the computer passes the test. Would passing the >> Turing test – something which now seems imminent – show that an AI has >> achieved thought and understanding? >> >> From >> <https://theconversation.com/chatgpt-cant-think-consciousness-is- something-entirely-different-to-todays-ai-204823> >> >> I invite all serious posters to participate. >> >> >> -- >> Nic <Nic@none.net> > > Your .sig separator is broken. It should comprise "dash, dash, space, > return" all on a line by itself. > This facilitates automatic stripping from quotation by standards > compliant Newsreader programs. > > Re: your question: > Does consciousness imply independent self-awareness? > If so then no, current AIs are not conscious, merely programmed. Programmed *to "learn"*, then "taught". > Are AIs capable of deception by way of passing the Turing test? > I would say yes; IMO the Turing Test is insufficiently rigorous and not > fit for purpose. Would you be willing to suggest a better test? -- -v
Back to comp.ai.shells | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling Nic <Nic@none.net> - 2023-05-18 18:26 -0400
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-05-19 00:19 +0100
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2023-05-19 06:54 +0100
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-05-19 10:59 +0100
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2023-05-27 09:25 +0000
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-05-27 10:57 +0100
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> - 2023-05-19 07:34 -0500
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2023-05-27 08:16 +0000
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-05-27 09:46 +0100
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2023-05-19 08:17 +0200
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-05-19 10:59 +0100
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2023-05-27 08:23 +0000
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2023-05-27 08:38 +0000
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-05-27 10:01 +0100
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2023-05-27 10:05 +0000
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-05-27 11:34 +0100
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-05-27 09:45 +0100
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluemanedhawk@gmail.com> - 2023-05-21 00:11 -0400
Re: For openers I submit an article that can get the ball rolling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-05-21 05:15 +0100
csiph-web