Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.computers > #60507
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | aus.computers |
| Subject | Re: The Government's War on Encryption |
| Date | 2017-07-23 11:14 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <etibkpFpflqU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <okop2e$13bj$1@gioia.aioe.org> <etbfjkF8rd6U1@mid.individual.net> <okrctp$1cj0$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ethcvpFitg8U1@mid.individual.net> <ol0phk$t5q$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
"Computer Nerd Kev" <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote in message news:ol0phk$t5q$1@gioia.aioe.org... > Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote: >> "Computer Nerd Kev" <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote in message >>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> "Computer Nerd Kev" <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote in message >>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> "Computer Nerd Kev" <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> "Computer Nerd Kev" <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> A new law proposed by Turnbull appears to be aimed at undermining >>>>>>>>> the security of all popular online services using encryption >>>>>>>>> to secure user's data. Particularly those offering end-to-end >>>>>>>>> encryption which ensures that even the service operators have >>>>>>>>> no way of accessing data stored and transferred through their >>>>>>>>> systems. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> With this in mind, I feel it should be asked: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If terrorism enables the erosion of the >>>>>>>>> capabilities offered by the internet, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Taint gunna happen, you watch. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> one of the key projects of the Western world in the 21st century, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 20th, actually. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Oh yes, never noticed. Funny that. Or perhaps I just meant that its >>>>>>> been advanced and popularised significantly during the 21st century? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> has it not, to some extent, begun to win? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nope. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And whatever that fool Turdbull wants, isnt going to happen. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There is no way that Apple will be providing anything that >>>>>>>> allows govt to snoop on what you are doing and even if >>>>>>>> they were that stupid, it completely trivial to ensure that >>>>>>>> govt can't do that, whatever legislation govt produces. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The internet isn't all run by Apple (thankfully), >>>>>> >>>>>> Sure, but that was just one example of an operation that >>>>>> wouldn?t do that even if Turdbull did make that law here. >>>>>> >>>>>> I doubt Apple would do it even if it was law in the US either. >>>>> >>>>> Rubbish, >>>> >>>> We'll see... >>>> >>>>> Apple have been part of NSA's Prism program since >>>>> 2012, along with Google, Facebook, and more. >>>> >>>> How odd that the FBI had to try to get the court to order them to >>>> assist with getting the data they wanted from a particular phone. >>> >>> While Apple were looking to clear their name. >> >> Even sillier than you usually manage. > > OK, if you insist. > >>> The NSA and the FBI doubless don't share the >>> same relationships with companies anyway. >> >> Even sillier than you usually manage. > > OK, if you insist. > >>>>> True they might not have known if they were hacked, but >>>>> they didn't go into panic mode when they found out either. >> >>>> They fixed the problem when it became clear what had happened. >> >>> The NSA documents released didn't describe the >>> actual exploits or backdoors used, so how would >>> we know whether everything was fixed or not? >> >> Because we know that the exploit that was used to get the >> info the FBI wanted by the 3rd party is not there any longer, >> so that technique can't be used with updated phones now. > > One backdoor being fixed doesn't mean that every backdoor was > fixed. Yet another straw man being thrashed. >>>>> https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/06/us-tech-giants-nsa-data >> >>>> Just because some fool journo claims something... >> >>> But when they claim something while showing the >>> actual slides from the NSA describing the system... >> >> You have no idea where those slides came from. >> >> The NSA certainly doesn't admit that they are theirs. > > Then Snowden and the Guardian went to > quite a lot of trouble just to make up a story. But you don’t know where he got those slides from. And it isnt relevant to your stupid claim about Apple anyway. >>>>>>> and it's not always trivial to ensure that other people are able >>>>>>> to use systems that you have cause to believe are still secure. >>>> >>>>>> Sure, but that?s irrelevant to whether >>>>>> that law would work here, it wouldn?t. >>>>>> >>>>>> The govt is now legally free to do anything it likes >>>>>> with respect to fucking over your system to snoop >>>>>> on it, but Apple particularly goes out of its way to >>>>>> stop that happening and even refuses court orders >>>>>> to fuck over a system that they have produced. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Its all just more mindless piss and wind from pollys. >>>>>> >>>>>>> The pollys in America and the UK have already >>>>>>> done a pretty good job of making it reality. >>>>>> >>>>>> Like hell they have with the most secure systems. >>>> >>>>> Nonsense, >>>> >>>> Fact. >>>> >>>>> the yanks forced the Lavabit email service, that was used by >>>>> Edward Snowden, to close in 2013 because they refused to >>>>> install a backdoor which would have allowed the government >>>>> access to all of their user's encrypted email data: >>>> >>>> And nothing even remotely like that happened with Apple. >>> >>> Again: The internet isn't just Apple. >> >> Having fun thrashing yet another straw man ? > > Must be the latest iPhone game... You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag.
Back to aus.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
The Government's War on Encryption not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-07-15 05:19 +0000
The Government's War on Encryption jonz <johnhhhinton7@gmail.com> - 2017-07-15 05:27 -0700
Re: The Government's War on Encryption Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-07-16 08:49 +1000
Re: The Government's War on Encryption SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2017-07-16 10:46 +1000
Re: The Government's War on Encryption not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-07-16 01:49 +0000
Re: The Government's War on Encryption "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 01:33 +1000
Re: The Government's War on Encryption "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 20:29 +1000
Re: The Government's War on Encryption not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-07-16 23:17 +0000
Re: The Government's War on Encryption "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-07-19 17:23 +1000
Re: The Government's War on Encryption not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-07-19 23:13 +0000
Re: The Government's War on Encryption "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 20:39 +1000
Re: The Government's War on Encryption not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-07-20 23:04 +0000
Re: The Government's War on Encryption "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-07-23 02:31 +1000
Re: The Government's War on Encryption not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-07-23 00:10 +0000
Re: The Government's War on Encryption "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-07-23 11:14 +1000
Re: The Government's War on Encryption not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-07-23 23:10 +0000
Re: The Government's War on Encryption "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-07-24 11:13 +1000
Re: The Government's War on Encryption not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-07-25 23:10 +0000
Re: The Government's War on Encryption "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-07-26 15:23 +1000
Re: The Government's War on Encryption not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-07-26 23:18 +0000
Re: The Government's War on Encryption "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 13:05 +1000
Re: The Government's War on Encryption not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-07-27 23:01 +0000
Re: The Government's War on Encryption "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 10:24 +1000
Re: The Government's War on Encryption not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-07-28 22:40 +0000
Re: The Government's War on Encryption "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-07-29 10:54 +1000
Re: The Government's War on Encryption not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-07-30 01:46 +0000
Re: The Government's War on Encryption keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-07-24 19:08 +1000
Re: The Government's War on Encryption not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-07-25 23:12 +0000
Re: The Government's War on Encryption Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-07-16 19:27 -0500
Re: The Government's War on Encryption "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-07-19 17:30 +1000
Re: The Government's War on Encryption Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-07-20 06:33 -0500
Re: The Government's War on Encryption "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 05:49 +1000
Re: The Government's War on Encryption keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-07-21 16:27 +1000
Re: The Government's War on Encryption Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-07-22 08:28 +1000
Re: The Government's War on Encryption Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-07-26 06:32 -0500
Re: The Government's War on Encryption keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-07-26 21:58 +1000
Re: The Government's War on Encryption Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-07-30 02:53 -0500
Re: The Government's War on Encryption Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 11:01 +1000
Re: The Government's War on Encryption "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-07-19 17:31 +1000
csiph-web