Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.computers > #56714
| From | felix <me@nothere.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | aus.computers |
| Subject | Re: Windose 10 |
| Date | 2016-12-26 11:50 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <ecb7q1Fmt3vU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (11 earlier) <ecarj3Fk6d5U1@mid.individual.net> <ecavvvFl6iaU2@mid.individual.net> <ecb5qgFmgatU1@mid.individual.net> <ecb6gfFml49U1@mid.individual.net> <ecb7dmFmqqtU1@mid.individual.net> |
On Monday, 26 Dec 2016 11:43 AM, felix wrote: > On Monday, 26 Dec 2016 11:27 AM, felix wrote: >> On Monday, 26 Dec 2016 11:16 AM, felix wrote: >>> On Monday, 26 Dec 2016 9:36 AM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "felix" <me@nothere.invalid> wrote in message >>>> news:ecarj3Fk6d5U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>> On Monday, 26 Dec 2016 12:26 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>> On Sunday, 25 Dec 2016 5:49 PM, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "felix" <me@nothere.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:ec95dpF7tbiU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>> On Sunday, 25 Dec 2016 12:06 AM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Saturday, 24 Dec 2016 10:09 PM, Grumpy Tech wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 24/12/2016 7:59 PM, felix wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 23 Dec 2016 10:28 PM, Computer Nerd Kev wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> felix <me@nothere.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> I've now determined that the problem is that the none of >>>>>>>>>>>>> the SATA ports >>>>>>>>>>>>> are working. the hard drive is not being seen and not >>>>>>>>>>>>> showing up in the >>>>>>>>>>>>> bios. so I assume that can only mean the SATA ports are >>>>>>>>>>>>> cactus, as the >>>>>>>>>>>>> drive has power. >>>>>>>>>>>> Ok it has power, but have you tried it in another PC to see >>>>>>>>>>>> whether the >>>>>>>>>>>> control electronics have thrown in the towl? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Any chance that the BIOS settings have got scrambled due to >>>>>>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>>>>> glitch or a failing backup battery and the SATA >>>>>>>>>>>> controller's simply >>>>>>>>>>>> disabled? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> it's showing up in the 'boot' section of the bios, and at >>>>>>>>>>> startup on the >>>>>>>>>>> blank black screen, but it's not showing as detected on the >>>>>>>>>>> sata port in >>>>>>>>>>> bios >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That's probably because your Bios is in AHCI mode >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> it is >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> which won't show drives there. Change the Bios to legacy mode >>>>>>>>>> and see if you can get it to boot >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> still won't boot and still doesn't show on the sata port >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> (Needs to be under 2tb). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 1Tb >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It's not a faulty MB. It sounds like the standard windows >>>>>>>>>> boot sector issue, which could indicate a drive that has a >>>>>>>>>> failed boot sector or the bcd file has been corrupted. Put it >>>>>>>>>> in your other machine on another sata port and run from an >>>>>>>>>> admin dos prompt chkdsk x: /r where x: is the drive letter >>>>>>>>>> given to the drive by your machine. It may resolve the issue. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You could also try this >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Open Command Prompt from Advanced Startup Options or System >>>>>>>>>> Recovery Options menu. Note: The Command Prompt available >>>>>>>>>> from these diagnostic menus is very similar to the one you >>>>>>>>>> may be familiar with within Windows. ... >>>>>>>>>> At the prompt, type the bootrec command as shown below and >>>>>>>>>> then press Enter: bootrec /rebuildbcd. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ok, thanks I'll try those after Xmas. see, you are good for >>>>>>>>> something after all.. :) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> couldn't wait. I tried it last night. no different. btw.. the >>>>>>>> win10 message I get is 'inaccessible boot device' which still >>>>>>>> seems to indicate a hardware problem >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's just saying it can't see a boot drive. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'd reset the cmos and see if the SATA ports work again. >>>>>> >>>>>> ok I'll give that a try tomorrow, thanks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Very unlikely to be a hardware failure with all 8 sata ports >>>>>>> going missing given that 6 of them are on 1 chip and the >>>>>>> other two are on a different one. >>>>>> >>>>>> makes sense >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nothing much shows up with google and that >>>>>>> motherboard, ask the manufacturer about it. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I've established the SATA ports are working. I installed Linux on >>>>> a DVD and booted with a SATA drive connected and I could read the >>>>> drive and load files. seems it's nothing more than a corrupt win10 >>>>> 64 bit installation >>>> >>>> Yeah, looks like it. And if you had made the recovery disk >>>> when it was still working, it may have been able to recover it. >>> >>> I'll certainly make one when it's up and running again. or maybe >>> there is some third party recovery software I could use? or does M$ >>> have any 'after the event' repair program that can be put on disc? >>> I'll start googling.. >>> >> >> Ill try this.. >> >> http://www.instructables.com/id/How-to-Repair-Corrupted-Windows-10-System-Files/ >> >> >> > > can't. no mouse pointer :( > > I see now I can get the dos box via advanced options. if the scan doesn't work, I'll try system restore from the latest restore point (if it's accessible) -- I plan on living forever. So far so good!
Back to aus.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-21 18:20 +1100
Re: Windose 10 Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2016-12-21 18:36 +1100
Re: Windose 10 jonz <johnhhhinton7@gmail.com> - 2016-12-21 03:13 -0800
Re: Windose 10 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-12-22 05:59 +1100
Re: Windose 10 Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2016-12-22 06:49 +1100
Re: Windose 10 Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2016-12-22 07:50 +1100
Re: Windose 10 Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2016-12-22 08:16 +1100
Re: Windose 10 Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2016-12-22 08:32 +1100
Re: Windose 10 Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2016-12-22 09:46 +1100
Re: Windose 10 Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2016-12-22 10:04 +1100
Re: Windose 10 Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2016-12-22 11:48 +1100
Re: Windose 10 "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2016-12-22 07:33 +1000
Re: Windose 10 Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2016-12-22 08:41 +1100
Re: Windose 10 Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2016-12-22 16:08 +0000
Re: Windose 10 Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2016-12-23 06:09 +1100
Re: Windose 10 Lucifer Morningstar <Barry@saymyname.com> - 2016-12-24 07:54 +1100
Re: Windose 10 "John" <dj34d@gmail.com> - 2016-12-22 11:34 +1100
Re: Windose 10 Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2016-12-21 22:30 +1100
Re: Windose 10 not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2016-12-21 21:46 +0000
Re: Windose 10 Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2016-12-22 09:48 +1100
Re: Windose 10 Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2016-12-22 10:06 +1100
Re: Windose 10 Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2016-12-22 11:49 +1100
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-22 15:13 +1100
Re: Windose 10 "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2016-12-22 14:42 +1000
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-22 15:12 +1100
Re: Windose 10 Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2016-12-21 22:06 +1100
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-22 15:08 +1100
Re: Windose 10 "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2016-12-22 14:44 +1000
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-22 21:05 +1100
Re: Windose 10 Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2016-12-22 16:21 +0000
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-23 17:47 +1100
Re: Windose 10 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 10:52 +1100
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-23 17:49 +1100
Re: Windose 10 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 17:57 +1100
Re: Windose 10 Lucifer Morningstar <Barry@saymyname.com> - 2016-12-23 19:11 +1100
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-24 20:29 +1100
Re: Windose 10 not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2016-12-23 11:28 +0000
Re: Windose 10 Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2016-12-24 05:46 +1100
Re: Windose 10 "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2016-12-24 07:19 +1000
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-24 20:47 +1100
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-24 20:46 +1100
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-24 20:50 +1100
Re: Windose 10 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-12-25 07:34 +1100
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-24 20:59 +1100
Re: Windose 10 Grumpy Tech <grumpytech07@gmail.com> - 2016-12-24 21:09 +1000
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-25 00:06 +1100
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-25 16:57 +1100
Re: Windose 10 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-12-25 17:49 +1100
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-26 00:26 +1100
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-26 08:21 +1100
Re: Windose 10 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-12-26 09:36 +1100
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-26 11:16 +1100
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-26 11:27 +1100
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-26 11:43 +1100
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-26 11:50 +1100
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-26 12:36 +1100
Re: Windose 10 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-12-26 12:57 +1100
Re: Windose 10 Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2016-12-26 12:02 +1100
Re: Windose 10 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-12-26 12:51 +1100
Re: Windose 10 "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2016-12-26 11:52 +1000
Re: Windose 10 Lucifer Morningstar <Barry@saymyname.com> - 2016-12-27 18:26 +1100
Re: Windose 10 Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2016-12-25 09:30 +1100
Re: Windose 10 keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2016-12-22 21:30 +1000
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-23 00:07 +1100
Re: Windose 10 Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 09:13 +1100
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-28 20:35 +1100
Re: Windose 10 Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2016-12-29 04:52 +1100
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-29 21:15 +1100
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-29 22:27 +1100
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-29 22:34 +1100
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-29 22:53 +1100
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-29 23:41 +1100
Re: Windose 10 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-12-30 05:54 +1100
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-30 11:01 +1100
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-30 11:04 +1100
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-30 13:27 +1100
Re: Windose 10 keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2016-12-30 16:08 +1000
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-30 17:32 +1100
Re: Windose 10 Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2016-12-30 19:26 +1100
Re: Windose 10 keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2016-12-30 23:54 +1000
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-30 17:35 +1100
Re: Windose 10 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-12-30 21:09 +1100
Re: Windose 10 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-12-30 21:07 +1100
Re: Windose 10 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-12-30 05:53 +1100
Re: Windose 10 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-12-30 05:52 +1100
Re: Windose 10 Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2016-12-30 11:43 +1100
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-30 13:25 +1100
Re: Windose 10 Grumpy Tech <grumpytech07@gmail.com> - 2016-12-30 14:15 +1000
Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-30 15:40 +1100
csiph-web