Re: Windose 10

From	felix <me@nothere.invalid>
Newsgroups	aus.computers
Subject	Re: Windose 10
Date	2016-12-30 15:40 +1100
Message-ID	<ecm6qiFap4pU8@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <echfapF680mU5@mid.individual.net> <8ru76ctjlnb7521iomnm20t2d29078vm9d@j.net> <eck629Fq8alU1@mid.individual.net> <u9bb6c56lmr9442at279u337kvc8t59ev6@j.net> <o44n08$p55$2@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw

On Friday, 30 Dec 2016 3:15 PM, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 30/12/2016 10:43 AM, j@j.org wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 Dec 2016 21:15:34 +1100, felix <me@nothere.invalid>
>
>>>>> I restored the drive from an image, and since it was several
>>>>> moths old, had to do umpteen updates, and some sofware
>>>>> installations. the good news is all the hardware is ok
>>>> News? No, that isn't news. It was already established the
>>>> hardware was fine.
>>>
>>> a thousand pardons your worship. I shall rewrite it just for you..
>>>
>>> "I restored the drive from an image, but since it was several moths
>>> old, I had to do umpteen updates, and some sofware installations.
>>> and as had been previously determined, there are no hardware
>>> issues, fortunately. and may I just take this opportunity to
>>> express my profound gratitude to Geebus for his invaluable
>>> contributions in solving this very difficult and often perplexing
>>> issue, and without whose assistance it may never have been solved"
>>>
>>> better?
>>
>> A little.
>>
> What no thanks for my and other peoples efforts to help you, you 
> ungrateful sod.

Oh, how could I have been so remiss!! a thousand and one pardons, your 
honour.

-- 
I plan on living forever. So far so good!

Back to aus.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-28 20:35 +1100
  Re: Windose 10 Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2016-12-29 04:52 +1100
    Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-29 21:15 +1100
      Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-29 22:27 +1100
        Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-29 22:34 +1100
          Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-29 22:53 +1100
            Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-29 23:41 +1100
              Re: Windose 10 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-12-30 05:54 +1100
                Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-30 11:01 +1100
                Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-30 11:04 +1100
                Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-30 13:27 +1100
                Re: Windose 10 keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2016-12-30 16:08 +1000
                Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-30 17:32 +1100
                Re: Windose 10 Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2016-12-30 19:26 +1100
                Re: Windose 10 keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2016-12-30 23:54 +1000
                Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-30 17:35 +1100
                Re: Windose 10 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-12-30 21:09 +1100
                Re: Windose 10 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-12-30 21:07 +1100
            Re: Windose 10 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-12-30 05:53 +1100
        Re: Windose 10 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-12-30 05:52 +1100
      Re: Windose 10 Jeßus <j@j.org> - 2016-12-30 11:43 +1100
        Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-30 13:25 +1100
        Re: Windose 10 Grumpy Tech <grumpytech07@gmail.com> - 2016-12-30 14:15 +1000
          Re: Windose 10 felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-12-30 15:40 +1100

csiph-web