Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.computers > #55131
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | aus.computers, aus.legal |
| Subject | Re: No fix no fee for computer problem |
| Date | 2016-09-07 10:46 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <e396asFa38aU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <mihssb9lnij912ifpgbg7ijhuvgvbfcfq1@j.net> <nqlogn$1rcs$1@gioia.aioe.org> <phfusb5uhi0ipogeq6lvnqjblctmculm72@j.net> <e38v6tF8jqaU1@mid.individual.net> <nqnirr$mas$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
"Pelican" <water-birds@sea.somewhere.org.ir> wrote in message news:nqnirr$mas$1@dont-email.me... > On 7/09/2016 08:44, Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >> "Jeßus" <j@j.invalid> wrote in message >> news:phfusb5uhi0ipogeq6lvnqjblctmculm72@j.net... >>> On Tue, 6 Sep 2016 16:30:42 +1000, "Max" <max@val.morgan> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> "Jeßus" <j@j.invalid> wrote in message >>>> news:mihssb9lnij912ifpgbg7ijhuvgvbfcfq1@j.net... >>>>> On Tue, 06 Sep 2016 14:01:56 +1000, Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Contractor called out to fix problem on computer that he failed to >>>>>> solve. Their sales pitch is just a no-fix no-fee basis. >>>>>> >>>>>> After failing to fix the problem a solution was offered to >>>>>> "re-install >>>>>> the system" on top of the old one. >>>>>> >>>>>> Is this "suggestion" the same as a "fix"? He was to do the fixing. >>>>> >>>>> Not IMO. As Pelican has pointed out, merely doing a reinstall usually >>>>> doesn't really address or fix the specific issue, it's more a lazy way >>>>> around the problem due to lack of knowledge, which then also means >>>>> having to reinstall all your programmes and doing >>>>> reconfiguring/tweaking to your personal needs. That's not a 'fix' to >>>>> me. There are instances where a full reinstall is the best solution, >>>>> but more often than not is used by a tech as the easy way out. >>>> >>>> That is not being fair on the tech who is trying hard to solve the >>>> problem >>>> and this is the kind of attitude he has to face every day. >> >>> It's like a mechanic replacing a carburetor when all it really needed >>> was a tune up >> >> Nothing even remotely like in fact. >> >>> (not a good analogy these days but it'll do the job). >> >> Wrong, as always. >> >>> There are times a fresh install is appropriate >> >> It isnt a fresh install, it's a repair install. >> >>> but that is also overused by techs whose knowledge is lacking. >> >> Its your knowledge that is lacking. You don't even know >> the difference between a fresh install and a repair install. >> >>> Seen it all too often. >> >> You haven't in fact seen a repair install. >> >>> I'm an ex-tech >> >> Who doesn't have a fucking clue about the basics. >> >>> and that's how I see things. >> >> Stupidly and pig ignorantly. > > Well, yes. That's what I would call your diagnosis requiring a repair > install when you don't have the least clue about the problem. It was the tech that did that, fuckwit. And he clearly has seen what the problem is. > It could be any one of several quite different causes, whether operating > system, hardware, other software, virus, etc. And the tech would have check if that was the problem before suggesting a repair install. And yes, it is certainly possible that a repair install may not fix the problem, but the obvious thing to do in that case is to do the much more involved clean install instead. > The offer to "re-install the system" on top of the old one sounds like a > fresh install, Only to a terminal fuckwit such as yourself. The words ON TOP OF isnt used with a clean install. No point calling it a repair install to that level of user, they wouldn’t have a fucking clue what that was. > not a repair install, or a system restore. But, since you have no idea > about the problem, you have no idea what the tech was thinking. Its obvious what the tech was thinking when he suggested a repair install.
Back to aus.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: No fix no fee for computer problem "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-09-07 08:44 +1000
Re: No fix no fee for computer problem Pelican <water-birds@sea.somewhere.org.ir> - 2016-09-07 09:18 +1000
Re: No fix no fee for computer problem Jeßus <j@j.invalid> - 2016-09-07 09:22 +1000
Re: No fix no fee for computer problem "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-09-07 10:47 +1000
Re: No fix no fee for computer problem "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-09-07 10:46 +1000
Re: No fix no fee for computer problem Pelican <water-birds@sea.somewhere.org.ir> - 2016-09-07 11:13 +1000
Re: No fix no fee for computer problem "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-09-07 12:28 +1000
Re: No fix no fee for computer problem Pelican <water-birds@sea.somewhere.org.ir> - 2016-09-07 12:31 +1000
Re: No fix no fee for computer problem "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-09-07 19:28 +1000
csiph-web