Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > alt.os.linux.mint > #47018
| From | Axel <none@not.here> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.os.linux.mint |
| Subject | Re: Very good rant about our loving linux |
| Date | 2026-03-07 00:18 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <n102gqFpd01U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (12 earlier) <10oa77j$38qvd$2@dont-email.me> <n0shjmF8iefU2@mid.individual.net> <n0tnvnFec78U1@mid.individual.net> <10ocgr8$10ku$1@dont-email.me> <slrn10qldbc.aaoh.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home> |
RonB wrote: > On 2026-03-05, Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote: >> On Thu, 3/5/2026 11:06 AM, Mike Easter wrote: >>> Axel wrote: >>>> Why do you use XFCE in preference to Cinnamon? >>> I use Cinnamon as my everyday driver, but I also like for my 'dabbling' distro/s to be lighter weight, all the way down to WMs instead of DEs. >>> >>> XFCE is on the lighter side; such as Gnome is certainly a heavyweight. Historically KDE has been 'all over the map' sometimes as low as XFCE and sometimes as high as they come. >>> >>> I'm happy that T Pearson has continued to keep Trinity DE fork of old KDE alive along w/ his fork of old Qt for a nice lightweight DE. >>> >> And we only emphasize this notion of "light weight" as >> a response to the capabilities of the computer. >> >> With Grahams 4400+ for example, a dual core Athlon64 at 2.2GHz or so, >> if the graphics acceleration worked, we might not have >> to pamper the thing. >> >> Where we get in trouble, is if the graphics driver reverts >> to little better than a frame buffer (XY array of pixels, >> no acceleration). The processor is then tasked with doing >> all the graphics operations itself. This leaves little horsepower >> for running Firefox internals. >> >> Whereas, when your processor has a lot of cores, then it is OK >> for some cores to do the graphics. My daily driver has 8 cores, >> so it's not all that powerful, but if the worst behavior >> I've seen is 4 cores railed while doing graphics, I have 4 cores >> left for running Firefox :-) That's where the extra cores come >> in handy. Relatively speaking, it does not matter whether >> I run XFCE or I run Cinnamon then. >> >> My laptop with the one core, where the one core is equal >> to half of Grahams processor, the situation for it is >> going to require a more economical distro (Puppy maybe >> or the TinyCore I tested). >> >> Paul > I've got Linux Mint Cinnamon 22.1 running on a Dell Latitude 3180, which was > basically a "schoolroom laptop." It has a dual core Intel Celeron N3350 CPU, > 8 GBs of RAM, Intel 500 GPU (HD Graphics, it says) and 128 GBs. I installed > a new battery and get a maximum of about 14 hours of battery life. It works > well on the Internet, can stream moves and YouTube and its rugged and cheap > enough that you don't mind carrying it around with you. I'm impressed with > it. And no fan. It hardly ever runs over 38°C. I like low heat and low power > without a fan. > > At any rate, I think Xfce vs Cinnamon (because is lighter) isn't necessarily > that strong of an argument. Cinnamon seems light enough (maybe it works > better if you have 8 GBs of RAM). > I have cinnamon running on a laptop with just 4 Gb ram. works fine. https://auslink.info/linux/laptop.png -- Linux Mint 22.3
Back to alt.os.linux.mint | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Very good rant about our loving linux yossarian <<nomail@gmail.com>> - 2026-02-28 12:33 +0100
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-02-28 10:23 -0800
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-01 01:40 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-03-01 15:15 -0500
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-02-28 22:08 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-02-28 14:25 -0800
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-01 01:33 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-03-01 07:24 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-03-01 08:27 -0800
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-03-03 02:54 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-03-02 22:21 -0500
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-03 04:52 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-03-03 05:31 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-03-03 09:17 -0800
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-03-03 21:17 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-03-03 13:44 -0800
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-03-03 14:03 -0800
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux yossarian <<nomail@gmail.com>> - 2026-03-04 10:35 +0100
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2026-02-28 17:34 -0500
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-02-28 14:44 -0800
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-03-01 07:27 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-03-01 08:37 -0800
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-01 19:52 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-03-01 12:04 +1100
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-01 01:29 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Handsome Jack <jack@handsome.com> - 2026-03-01 10:52 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-03-02 00:20 +1100
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Handsome Jack <jack@handsome.com> - 2026-03-01 15:01 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-03-02 07:45 +1100
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-03-01 21:22 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Handsome Jack <jack@handsome.com> - 2026-03-02 15:06 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-03-02 21:18 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-03-03 17:58 +1100
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Handsome Jack <jack@handsome.com> - 2026-03-03 07:57 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-03-03 23:10 +1100
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Handsome Jack <jack@handsome.com> - 2026-03-03 14:20 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-03 20:19 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-03-04 10:54 +1100
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-03-04 10:58 +1100
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-03 20:18 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-03-03 12:50 -0800
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-03-03 13:02 -0800
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-03-03 13:10 -0800
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-03-03 22:39 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Handsome Jack <jack@handsome.com> - 2026-03-04 15:48 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-03-04 20:42 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Handsome Jack <jack@handsome.com> - 2026-03-04 21:08 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-03-04 19:16 -0500
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-03-05 16:10 +1100
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Handsome Jack <jack@handsome.com> - 2026-03-05 16:17 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-03-05 08:29 -0800
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-03-05 08:42 -0800
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-03-03 17:51 -0500
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Handsome Jack <jack@handsome.com> - 2026-03-04 15:50 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-03-04 20:46 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Handsome Jack <jack@handsome.com> - 2026-03-04 21:12 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-03-05 16:11 +1100
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Handsome Jack <jack@handsome.com> - 2026-03-05 11:15 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-03-05 23:35 +1100
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-05 20:33 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2026-03-06 10:49 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2026-03-06 10:48 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-06 20:01 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2026-03-07 02:46 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-07 06:29 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Handsome Jack <jack@handsome.com> - 2026-03-07 10:37 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-03-07 08:41 -0800
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-07 21:06 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-03-07 13:18 -0800
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-03-07 14:47 -0800
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-08 00:33 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-08 00:26 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-03-08 03:59 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-03-08 10:09 -0700
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux yossarian <<nomail@gmail.com>> - 2026-03-08 21:55 +0100
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-03-08 14:34 -0700
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-03-08 15:03 -0700
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2026-03-09 06:42 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-03-07 11:52 -0500
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-03-07 12:51 -0800
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-03-08 03:58 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2026-03-08 10:28 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-03-08 10:15 -0700
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-07 21:16 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Handsome Jack <jack@handsome.com> - 2026-03-08 09:57 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux yossarian <<nomail@gmail.com>> - 2026-03-08 14:19 +0100
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-07 20:59 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2026-03-08 10:24 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-03-08 12:53 -0400
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-03-08 10:21 -0700
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-09 02:40 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2026-03-09 06:39 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-09 23:46 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2026-03-10 04:47 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-03-10 10:13 -0700
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-03-09 10:43 -0700
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-09 23:50 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2026-03-09 06:37 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2026-03-09 06:33 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-03-05 08:06 -0800
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-03-05 13:08 -0500
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2026-03-06 11:07 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-03-07 00:18 +1100
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-06 19:52 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-03-06 09:38 -0500
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2026-03-06 18:13 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-05 20:01 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2026-03-06 10:08 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-03-06 10:30 -0500
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-03-06 08:36 -0800
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-03-06 09:13 -0800
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-03-06 09:21 -0800
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2026-03-06 18:18 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-03-06 11:14 -0800
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-06 20:13 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-03-07 00:09 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-06 20:09 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2026-03-06 10:52 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-06 19:55 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2026-03-07 02:43 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Handsome Jack <jack@handsome.com> - 2026-03-03 08:00 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-03-03 22:38 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-03-03 21:30 -0500
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Handsome Jack <jack@handsome.com> - 2026-03-04 11:56 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-03-04 20:47 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-03-01 18:09 -0500
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Handsome Jack <jack@handsome.com> - 2026-03-02 15:04 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-03-02 16:21 -0500
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2026-03-02 03:27 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Handsome Jack <jack@handsome.com> - 2026-03-02 15:01 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-01 19:51 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-03-01 13:12 -0800
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-02 01:19 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-03-02 08:41 -0800
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-03-02 08:59 -0800
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-03-02 09:08 -0800
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-03-02 09:20 -0800
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-02 18:21 +0000
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-03-02 11:58 -0800
Re: Very good rant about our loving linux rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-03 05:18 +0000
csiph-web