Re: KDE systems, your vote.

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid>
Newsgroups	alt.os.linux.mint
Subject	Re: KDE systems, your vote.
Date	Sat, 28 Dec 2024 10:24:24 -0800
Lines	21
Message-ID	<ltau2pFod14U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<vkf77b$20qfn$1@dont-email.me> <lt91irFf3viU1@mid.individual.net> <vknna2$3uajp$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	individual.net +YUfVMc1d5U9t/AE1k6OWg8YPtBD1603AbSxxEdkPL9rZSpNjh
Cancel-Lock	sha1:r/fBWZK9F8Lw4nrNbwgbJjJEhtk= sha256:uiBvyM+0J5YrhKlm9WPZ9fbNcdNppeglWWFyt1ZXBsw=
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
In-Reply-To	<vknna2$3uajp$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language	en-US
Xref	csiph.com alt.os.linux.mint:43564

Show key headers only | View raw

Alan K. wrote:
> For the whole, I've tweaked MX and produced a system that I can sit on 
> for hours and almost forget where I am.

In terms of 'rankings', I liked MX's KDE more than I did Endeavour.  In 
the first place, like its XFCE sibling, it has all of those wonderful MX 
tools.  In the next place, it is based on Deb instead of Arch.  I like a 
lot of what the Arch dev/s have done 'for the community' not the least 
of which is their wonderful documentation and arch wiki, but even w/ the 
AUR, Deb has tons more packages.

The basic Arch is not as 'beginner-friendly' as an intermediate like 
myself prefers, and even Endeavor is somewhat 'anti-GUI' in its attitude 
about package management.

Manjaro KDE is more my speed for an Arch distro than Endeavour; I 
haven't compared it lately w/ MX's KDE, so I don't know how to handle 
that ranking comparison.  I think I'll take a peek at Manjaro again.

-- 
Mike Easter

Back to alt.os.linux.mint | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

KDE systems, your vote. "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2024-12-24 15:57 -0500
  Re: KDE systems, your vote. Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2024-12-24 13:35 -0800
    Re: KDE systems, your vote. "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2024-12-24 17:19 -0500
      Re: KDE systems, your vote. Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2024-12-24 20:56 -0800
        Re: KDE systems, your vote. Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2024-12-24 22:18 -0800
          Re: KDE systems, your vote. Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2024-12-25 13:34 -0800
      Re: KDE systems, your vote. Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2025-01-11 15:24 -0500
  Re: KDE systems, your vote. Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-12-24 16:36 -0500
    Re: KDE systems, your vote. "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2024-12-24 17:15 -0500
  Re: KDE systems, your vote. Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> - 2024-12-25 01:08 +0100
    Re: KDE systems, your vote. "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2024-12-25 07:44 -0500
      Re: KDE systems, your vote. "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2024-12-25 19:47 -0500
        Re: KDE systems, your vote. Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-12-26 02:24 -0500
  Re: KDE systems, your vote. Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2024-12-27 17:11 -0800
    Re: KDE systems, your vote. "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2024-12-27 21:20 -0500
      Re: KDE systems, your vote. Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2024-12-28 10:24 -0800
        Re: KDE systems, your vote. Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2024-12-28 13:29 -0800

csiph-web