Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.os.linux.mint > #43565

Re: KDE systems, your vote.

From Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid>
Newsgroups alt.os.linux.mint
Subject Re: KDE systems, your vote.
Date 2024-12-28 13:29 -0800
Message-ID <ltb8ucFq37rU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <vkf77b$20qfn$1@dont-email.me> <lt91irFf3viU1@mid.individual.net> <vknna2$3uajp$1@dont-email.me> <ltau2pFod14U1@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw


Mike Easter wrote:
> Manjaro KDE is more my speed for an Arch distro than Endeavour; I 
> haven't compared it lately w/ MX's KDE, so I don't know how to handle 
> that ranking comparison.  I think I'll take a peek at Manjaro again.

Manjaro has a GUI package manager in the form of pamac, and like its 
parent arch, manjaro has organized documentation in the form of a wiki 
that 'resembles' the famous arch wiki.  In terms of package management, 
like arch, the use of the command line pacman is encouraged, but the 
docs also instruct in the use of pamac's CLI.  The help for GUI octopi 
isn't there.

My experience w/ using command line package management in endeavour OR 
manjaro is 'hectic' in the problem of question/response required processes.

I think the big problem w/ arch-based package management is the 
underlying 'mechanism' by which packages are installed having some 
'fragility' including that of the AUR packages.

My 'discussing' KDE and Arch-based in a LM group is way off-topic, since 
LM long ago dropped KDE DE from its lineup and is a Deb/Ub distro, not Arch.

-- 
Mike Easter

Back to alt.os.linux.mint | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

KDE systems, your vote. "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2024-12-24 15:57 -0500
  Re: KDE systems, your vote. Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2024-12-24 13:35 -0800
    Re: KDE systems, your vote. "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2024-12-24 17:19 -0500
      Re: KDE systems, your vote. Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2024-12-24 20:56 -0800
        Re: KDE systems, your vote. Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2024-12-24 22:18 -0800
          Re: KDE systems, your vote. Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2024-12-25 13:34 -0800
      Re: KDE systems, your vote. Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2025-01-11 15:24 -0500
  Re: KDE systems, your vote. Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-12-24 16:36 -0500
    Re: KDE systems, your vote. "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2024-12-24 17:15 -0500
  Re: KDE systems, your vote. Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> - 2024-12-25 01:08 +0100
    Re: KDE systems, your vote. "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2024-12-25 07:44 -0500
      Re: KDE systems, your vote. "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2024-12-25 19:47 -0500
        Re: KDE systems, your vote. Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-12-26 02:24 -0500
  Re: KDE systems, your vote. Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2024-12-27 17:11 -0800
    Re: KDE systems, your vote. "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2024-12-27 21:20 -0500
      Re: KDE systems, your vote. Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2024-12-28 10:24 -0800
        Re: KDE systems, your vote. Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2024-12-28 13:29 -0800

csiph-web