Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #12272

Re: Non-migration of cssutils

From Martin <debacle@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Non-migration of cssutils
Date 2020-02-06 12:40 +0100
Message-ID <zwNFL-4RC-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <zwNcK-4Iq-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <zwNcK-4Iq-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Quoting Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org>:
> I reckon the way forward is to fix those two FTBFS in calibre.

If calibre gets removed from testing on 2020-02-16, the reason
for non-migration of cssutils and removing depending packages
from testing, e.g. gajim, vanishes. Will this work out due to
britneys wisdom? Or should calibre better removed from testing
before 2020-02-16, if problems are not fixed until then?

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Non-migration of cssutils Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2020-02-06 12:10 +0100
  Re: Non-migration of cssutils Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2020-02-06 12:10 +0100
    Re: Non-migration of cssutils Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2020-02-06 12:40 +0100
      Re: Non-migration of cssutils Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2020-02-06 14:20 +0100
        Re: Non-migration of cssutils Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2020-02-06 16:30 +0100
  Re: FWD: [debian-python on Calibre] Non-migration of cssutils Norbert Preining <norbert@preining.info> - 2020-02-06 21:50 +0100

csiph-web