Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #12272

Re: Non-migration of cssutils

Path csiph.com!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.albasani.net!tahina.priv.at!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Martin <debacle@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Non-migration of cssutils
Date Thu, 06 Feb 2020 12:40:01 +0100
Message-ID <zwNFL-4RC-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <zwNcK-4Iq-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <zwNcK-4Iq-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Thu Feb 6 11:30:58 2020
Old-Return-Path <debacle@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-7.7 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate:hard: -3.5
Old-X-Envelope-From debacle@debian.org
User-Agent Horde Application Framework 5
Accept-Language en,de,es
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Disposition inline
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/17895
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20200206122908.Horde.3TDbodbanqqycnMydtDU71K@webmail.in-berlin.de
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 8
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc Debian Python <debian-python@lists.debian.org>, Martin Pitt <mpitt@debian.org>, Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org>
X-Original-Date Thu, 06 Feb 2020 12:29:08 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID <20200206122908.Horde.3TDbodbanqqycnMydtDU71K@webmail.in-berlin.de>
X-Original-References <20200206120036.Horde.prZTxJBAJQR_VxoeksERtqi@webmail.in-berlin.de> <20200206110643.GD42450@mapreri.org>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:12272

Show key headers only | View raw

Quoting Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org>:
> I reckon the way forward is to fix those two FTBFS in calibre.

If calibre gets removed from testing on 2020-02-16, the reason
for non-migration of cssutils and removing depending packages
from testing, e.g. gajim, vanishes. Will this work out due to
britneys wisdom? Or should calibre better removed from testing
before 2020-02-16, if problems are not fixed until then?

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Non-migration of cssutils Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2020-02-06 12:10 +0100
  Re: Non-migration of cssutils Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2020-02-06 12:10 +0100
    Re: Non-migration of cssutils Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2020-02-06 12:40 +0100
      Re: Non-migration of cssutils Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2020-02-06 14:20 +0100
        Re: Non-migration of cssutils Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2020-02-06 16:30 +0100
  Re: FWD: [debian-python on Calibre] Non-migration of cssutils Norbert Preining <norbert@preining.info> - 2020-02-06 21:50 +0100

csiph-web