Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #220470

Re: Buster without systemd?

From deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Buster without systemd?
Date 2020-03-25 12:20 +0100
Message-ID <zOceK-2C8-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <zNP8u-58b-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <zNSpI-7gP-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <zNUhQ-8py-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <zNXSp-1Z9-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <zOacV-1po-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Andrei POPESCU wrote:

> As far as I can tell network manager is *not* using systemd-networkd in
> the background (it doesn't depend on systemd).

No, it doesn't but both of them use dbus and obviously can talk to each
other there.

So the advantage is when systemd does something network manager can react
and vice versa.

but I do not have systemd-networkd or -resolved installed

$ dpkg -l | grep systemd
ii  libpam-systemd:amd64                    241-7~deb10u3                                    
amd64        system and service manager - PAM module
ii  libsystemd0:amd64                       241-7~deb10u3                                    
amd64        systemd utility library
ii  systemd                                 241-7~deb10u3                                    
amd64        system and service manager
ii  systemd-sysv:i386                       241-7~deb10u3                                    
i386         system and service manager - SysV links

I was going to figure out why systemd-sysv:i386 is selected over
systemd-sysv:amd64, but couldn't allocate time and motivation so far.

And BTW I can not find anything like networkd

$ apt-cache search systemd | grep network
networkd-dispatcher - Dispatcher service for systemd-networkd connection
status changes

or resolved

$ apt-cache search systemd | grep resolv
openvpn-systemd-resolved - integrates OpenVPN with systemd-resolved
resolvconf-admin - setuid helper program for setting up the local DNS
libnss-mymachines - nss module to resolve hostnames for local container
instances
libnss-resolve - nss module to resolve names via systemd-resolved

I have no idea what people are complaining of here. Shouldn't I stay at
home, I would not even read or write this ... pure coincidence.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Buster without systemd? kjonca@fastmail.com (Kamil Jońca) - 2020-03-23 20:10 +0100
  Re: Buster without systemd? Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2020-03-23 23:20 +0100
  Re: Buster without systemd? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-03-24 11:40 +0100
    Re: Buster without systemd? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-03-24 15:10 +0100
      Re: Buster without systemd? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-03-24 16:30 +0100
        Re: Buster without systemd? Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-03-24 16:50 +0100
          Re: Buster without systemd? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-03-24 20:50 +0100
            Re: Buster without systemd? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-03-25 17:10 +0100
              Re: ethernet cfg via cmdline (was: Buster without systemd?) Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2020-03-25 17:40 +0100
                Re: ethernet cfg via kernel cmdline (was: Buster without systemd?) Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-03-25 18:10 +0100
                Re: ethernet cfg via kernel cmdline (was: Buster without systemd?) Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-03-26 15:40 +0100
      Re: Buster without systemd? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-03-24 17:10 +0100
        Re: Buster without systemd? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2020-03-24 20:50 +0100
        Re: Buster without systemd? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-03-24 21:00 +0100
          Re: Buster without systemd? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-03-25 04:30 +0100
            Re: Buster without systemd? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-03-25 08:40 +0100
              Re: Buster without systemd? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-03-25 20:10 +0100
            Re: Buster without systemd? Liam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole@gmail.com> - 2020-03-25 21:40 +0100
              Re: Buster without systemd? [with backtrack] David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-03-26 03:20 +0100
                Re: Buster without systemd? [with backtrack] deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-03-26 08:30 +0100
                Re: Buster without systemd? [with backtrack] David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-03-27 04:30 +0100
                Re: Buster without systemd? [with backtrack] mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> - 2020-03-27 08:20 +0100
                Re: Buster without systemd? [with backtrack] Liam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole@gmail.com> - 2020-03-26 11:10 +0100
                Re: Buster without systemd? [with backtrack] rhkramer@gmail.com - 2020-03-26 12:20 +0100
          Re: Buster without systemd? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-03-25 10:10 +0100
            Re: Buster without systemd? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-03-25 12:20 +0100
              Re: Buster without systemd? Ansgar <ansgar@43-1.org> - 2020-03-25 12:50 +0100
              Re: Buster without systemd? The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2020-03-25 13:00 +0100

csiph-web