Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #220394

Re: Buster without systemd?

From Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Buster without systemd?
Date 2020-03-24 16:50 +0100
Message-ID <zNTYu-83x-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <zNACu-4JR-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <zNACu-4JR-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <zNP8u-58b-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <zNSpI-7gP-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <zNTF7-7WJ-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


	Hi.

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 05:05:27PM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Ma, 24 mar 20, 14:49:03, deloptes wrote:
> > Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > 
> > > systemd-networkd is not meant to do very complicated configurations.
> > > 
> > > Why should I install an additional package (e.g. ifupdown, Network
> > > Manager, etc.) just for setting up a static IP?
> > 
> > well - for static IP you don't need systemd
> 
> Well, "something" has to bring up the interface with the correct IP and 
> set up the default route, even if it's "just" a script calling 'ip', 
> which I would then have to manually plug-in somewhere in the boot 
> process.

Actually, deloptes is right and you're not.

Kernel's documentation - [1] - describes a way to force a kernel itself
to configure a network interface for IPv4, be it static or DHCP, along
with the primitive routing table (default gw at most).

Taking IPv6's RA into the account, one does not need anything but the
working kernel on the client side to get IPv6 and a primitive routing
table.

Reco

[1] /usr/share/doc/linux-doc-4.19/Documentation/filesystems/nfs/nfsroot.txt.gz

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Buster without systemd? kjonca@fastmail.com (Kamil Jońca) - 2020-03-23 20:10 +0100
  Re: Buster without systemd? Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2020-03-23 23:20 +0100
  Re: Buster without systemd? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-03-24 11:40 +0100
    Re: Buster without systemd? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-03-24 15:10 +0100
      Re: Buster without systemd? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-03-24 16:30 +0100
        Re: Buster without systemd? Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-03-24 16:50 +0100
          Re: Buster without systemd? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-03-24 20:50 +0100
            Re: Buster without systemd? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-03-25 17:10 +0100
              Re: ethernet cfg via cmdline (was: Buster without systemd?) Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2020-03-25 17:40 +0100
                Re: ethernet cfg via kernel cmdline (was: Buster without systemd?) Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-03-25 18:10 +0100
                Re: ethernet cfg via kernel cmdline (was: Buster without systemd?) Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-03-26 15:40 +0100
      Re: Buster without systemd? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-03-24 17:10 +0100
        Re: Buster without systemd? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2020-03-24 20:50 +0100
        Re: Buster without systemd? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-03-24 21:00 +0100
          Re: Buster without systemd? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-03-25 04:30 +0100
            Re: Buster without systemd? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-03-25 08:40 +0100
              Re: Buster without systemd? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-03-25 20:10 +0100
            Re: Buster without systemd? Liam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole@gmail.com> - 2020-03-25 21:40 +0100
              Re: Buster without systemd? [with backtrack] David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-03-26 03:20 +0100
                Re: Buster without systemd? [with backtrack] deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-03-26 08:30 +0100
                Re: Buster without systemd? [with backtrack] David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-03-27 04:30 +0100
                Re: Buster without systemd? [with backtrack] mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> - 2020-03-27 08:20 +0100
                Re: Buster without systemd? [with backtrack] Liam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole@gmail.com> - 2020-03-26 11:10 +0100
                Re: Buster without systemd? [with backtrack] rhkramer@gmail.com - 2020-03-26 12:20 +0100
          Re: Buster without systemd? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-03-25 10:10 +0100
            Re: Buster without systemd? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-03-25 12:20 +0100
              Re: Buster without systemd? Ansgar <ansgar@43-1.org> - 2020-03-25 12:50 +0100
              Re: Buster without systemd? The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2020-03-25 13:00 +0100

csiph-web