Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #220415
| From | deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Buster without systemd? |
| Date | 2020-03-24 20:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <zNXIJ-1VC-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <zNACu-4JR-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <zNP8u-58b-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <zNSpI-7gP-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <zNTF7-7WJ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <zNTYu-83x-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Reco wrote: > Actually, deloptes is right and you're not. > > Kernel's documentation - [1] - describes a way to force a kernel itself > to configure a network interface for IPv4, be it static or DHCP, along > with the primitive routing table (default gw at most). > > Taking IPv6's RA into the account, one does not need anything but the > working kernel on the client side to get IPv6 and a primitive routing > table. > > Reco > > [1] > [/usr/share/doc/linux-doc-4.19/Documentation/filesystems/nfs/nfsroot.txt.gz Thank you Reco, you obsoleted my reply. I will just add few things. I and many more have been using diskless boot and nfsroot even before the time systemd emerged. What I find good is the dynamic management of services - I do not remember where I read this, but it was a good article about the need to move forward from old init. This enlightened me. Thinking over, I came to the conclusion that the people are right about this need. It seems only the way they did it was wrong. However, thanks Debian, no one was forced to do anything. At the end people still complain (my opinion) not because systemd is not working well, but because they have to learn something new. I still do not understand why RedHat should use it on the servers as I personally do not see much of advantage, but it just works, so why not.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Buster without systemd? kjonca@fastmail.com (Kamil Jońca) - 2020-03-23 20:10 +0100
Re: Buster without systemd? Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2020-03-23 23:20 +0100
Re: Buster without systemd? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-03-24 11:40 +0100
Re: Buster without systemd? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-03-24 15:10 +0100
Re: Buster without systemd? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-03-24 16:30 +0100
Re: Buster without systemd? Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-03-24 16:50 +0100
Re: Buster without systemd? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-03-24 20:50 +0100
Re: Buster without systemd? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-03-25 17:10 +0100
Re: ethernet cfg via cmdline (was: Buster without systemd?) Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2020-03-25 17:40 +0100
Re: ethernet cfg via kernel cmdline (was: Buster without systemd?) Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-03-25 18:10 +0100
Re: ethernet cfg via kernel cmdline (was: Buster without systemd?) Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-03-26 15:40 +0100
Re: Buster without systemd? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-03-24 17:10 +0100
Re: Buster without systemd? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2020-03-24 20:50 +0100
Re: Buster without systemd? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-03-24 21:00 +0100
Re: Buster without systemd? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-03-25 04:30 +0100
Re: Buster without systemd? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-03-25 08:40 +0100
Re: Buster without systemd? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-03-25 20:10 +0100
Re: Buster without systemd? Liam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole@gmail.com> - 2020-03-25 21:40 +0100
Re: Buster without systemd? [with backtrack] David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-03-26 03:20 +0100
Re: Buster without systemd? [with backtrack] deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-03-26 08:30 +0100
Re: Buster without systemd? [with backtrack] David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-03-27 04:30 +0100
Re: Buster without systemd? [with backtrack] mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> - 2020-03-27 08:20 +0100
Re: Buster without systemd? [with backtrack] Liam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole@gmail.com> - 2020-03-26 11:10 +0100
Re: Buster without systemd? [with backtrack] rhkramer@gmail.com - 2020-03-26 12:20 +0100
Re: Buster without systemd? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-03-25 10:10 +0100
Re: Buster without systemd? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-03-25 12:20 +0100
Re: Buster without systemd? Ansgar <ansgar@43-1.org> - 2020-03-25 12:50 +0100
Re: Buster without systemd? The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2020-03-25 13:00 +0100
csiph-web