Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #219265
| From | Nektarios Katakis <nektarios@mail.nektarioskatakis.xyz> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. |
| Date | 2020-02-19 12:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <zBvyx-WL-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <zAPIZ-co-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <zAS4a-1KL-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <zBbq9-5r2-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <zBbq9-5r2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <zBvfb-A9-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Στις 2020-02-19 10:38, didier.gaumet@gmail.com έγραψε: > Le mardi 18 février 2020 14:50:04 UTC+1, Nektarios Katakis a écrit : >> Στις 2020-02-18 12:41, Anastasios Lisgaras έγραψε: > [...] > [...] >> > Thank you for your answer. About "backports firmwares" what should I >> > do? >> > What do you have to recommend me? >> > ( I didn't know that at all ) > > cf https://wiki.debian.org/Firmware > > I think that the only firmwares installed are those you installed > yourself manually (if any), no one is automatically pulled by default. > as root: > # aptitude search firmware > would display most of the firmwares (it's a search by names containing > 'firmware' and some firmwares do not contain 'firmware' in their > name). The status 'ii' means a firmware is installed. > > What I meant previously is that it is preferable to have a firmware > (related to a hardware) that is coherent with the driver for this > hardware included in the kernel. So if you have a hardware that needs > a firmware and you use a Backports kernel, it is probably preferable > to install the Backports version of the needed firmware. > >> > Finally, a very important question: >> > Can I go back to where I was before the update ( with only stretch >> > source ) ? >> >> You should definitely be able to do this since the `apt upgrade` >> command >> you >> ran ended without any errors (your system is not broken anyhow). >> >> > I mention this because the official documentation itself (and you) >> > states that you do not recommend what I did. >> > >> > There is a way to "I pull a rope" and go back to my sturdy/robust port >> > of stretch repositories/resources ? >> >> Simply revert the changes sources (apt edit-sources) and >> `apt update && apt upgrade` > [...] > > I do not think this will do the trick: if I recall correctly, it will > end up with Backports packages marked something like 'local' or > 'obsolete' without being downgraded to their Strech version. > > The best solution would probably to do a fresh install. > But if you want to take the chance, here is a trick to downgrade: > https://wiki.debian.org/SystemDowngrade Interesting I thought you could downgrade with the package manager. from the looks of it you end up with an unstable system. I had removed repos in the past and the packages were removed automatically but I guess I was lucky!
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. Nektarios Katakis <nektarios@mail.nektarioskatakis.xyz> - 2020-02-17 15:40 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. didier.gaumet@gmail.com - 2020-02-17 18:10 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. Nektarios Katakis <nektarios@mail.nektarioskatakis.xyz> - 2020-02-18 14:50 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. David Anthony <david.fosdick.anthony@gmail.com> - 2020-02-19 02:40 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2020-02-19 07:00 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. didier.gaumet@gmail.com - 2020-02-19 12:00 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. Nektarios Katakis <nektarios@mail.nektarioskatakis.xyz> - 2020-02-19 12:20 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2020-02-19 12:40 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2020-02-19 14:50 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> - 2020-02-19 13:20 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2020-02-19 14:50 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. Anastasios Lisgaras <tasosnumberten@yahoo.gr> - 2020-02-22 11:50 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. didier.gaumet@gmail.com - 2020-02-22 19:30 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. Anastasios Lisgaras <tasosnumberten@yahoo.gr> - 2020-02-22 20:30 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. didier.gaumet@gmail.com - 2020-02-22 23:10 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. Anastasios Lisgaras <tasosnumberten@yahoo.gr> - 2020-02-23 00:40 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. didier.gaumet@gmail.com - 2020-02-23 11:20 +0100
csiph-web