Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #219229
| From | didier.gaumet@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. |
| Date | 2020-02-17 18:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <zAS4a-1KL-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <zAPIZ-co-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <zAPJ0-co-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <zAPIZ-co-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <zAS4a-1KL-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
> Στις 2020-02-17 13:17, Anastasios Lisgaras έγραψε: [...] > > 1. I created this file : /etc/apt/sources.list.d/stretch-backports.list > > (https://pastebin.com/raw/YM11TDer) > > 2. I also created this file : > > /etc/apt/preferences.d/89_stretch-backports_default > > (https://pastebin.com/raw/F6vjDEgh). > > > > and then I ran : > > ``` > > apt update && apt list --upgradable && apt dist-upgrade && apt-get > > autoremove -y && apt-get autoclean -y && apt-get clean [...] > > The problem is that after restarting the computer could not boot > > properly and especially with a graphical interface. [...] > > - Is the upgrade to blame? Hasn't it been done correctly (basically it > > definitely won't have been done correctly) ? > > - Do you think I should add it here > > `/etc/apt/sources.list.d/stretch-backports.list` > > (https://pastebin.com/raw/YM11TDer) the 'contrib non-free' at the end > > of > > the two sources? > > > > What is to blame and what should I do to fix it? [...] Hello, As far as I understand it: - Backports repository is not intended as an ordinary repo from which you can install all the packages.Its purpose is to let the user install selected packages for which there is a need for a more recent version (option -t). Installing all packages from backports may lead to problems. - By default your ordinary repo has a 500 priority and backports a 100 priority: when you set up a 500 priority for backports, it means that that backports has priority over your ordinary repo, because the version numbers are higher. - If your ordinary (Oldstable or Stretch, in your case) repo line (or sources.list.d file) in sources.list mentions "contrib non-free" it is preferable to mention it too for the backports line. Then, generally, if you use a backports kernel, you will want to use also the backports firmwares instead of the ordinary ones. the backports page of the wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/Backports
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. Nektarios Katakis <nektarios@mail.nektarioskatakis.xyz> - 2020-02-17 15:40 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. didier.gaumet@gmail.com - 2020-02-17 18:10 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. Nektarios Katakis <nektarios@mail.nektarioskatakis.xyz> - 2020-02-18 14:50 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. David Anthony <david.fosdick.anthony@gmail.com> - 2020-02-19 02:40 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2020-02-19 07:00 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. didier.gaumet@gmail.com - 2020-02-19 12:00 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. Nektarios Katakis <nektarios@mail.nektarioskatakis.xyz> - 2020-02-19 12:20 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2020-02-19 12:40 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2020-02-19 14:50 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> - 2020-02-19 13:20 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2020-02-19 14:50 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. Anastasios Lisgaras <tasosnumberten@yahoo.gr> - 2020-02-22 11:50 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. didier.gaumet@gmail.com - 2020-02-22 19:30 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. Anastasios Lisgaras <tasosnumberten@yahoo.gr> - 2020-02-22 20:30 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. didier.gaumet@gmail.com - 2020-02-22 23:10 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. Anastasios Lisgaras <tasosnumberten@yahoo.gr> - 2020-02-23 00:40 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. didier.gaumet@gmail.com - 2020-02-23 11:20 +0100
csiph-web