Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #213224

Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective

From Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective
Date 2019-08-25 03:30 +0200
Message-ID <yyPvX-8vT-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <yyOJz-7Yi-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

I dont detect a failure of vision causing the problems you mention. I
detect "AI" in the service of attaining cash inflow.
Second, i like what Feigenbaum said about AI some time ago. It is actually
a deep remark: Every time we think we made an advance towards AI, it turns
out that we only wrote a good program.

On Sat, Aug 24, 2019, 7:39 PM bw <bwtnguy@yahoo.com> wrote:

> If we start back at the science fiction beginning of the idea, we see that
> Asimov really did not anticipate the implications of AI impersonating
> human intelligence.  Some of his stories did have robots/androids that
> impersonated humans, but ignored the fundamentals... robots should
> disclose themselves upon demand.  It should be a basic law.
>
> This failure of vision IMO has led to many of the problems we now are
> faced with, like, How to stop Robocalls?  WTF do we do when the grid goes
> down and the computer won't cooperate??  Why does the bank keep saying I
> have three last names?, etc..
>
> It's off-topic, so I alopogize.  I thought some of the non-AI readers may
> find it interesting.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Laws_of_Robotics
>
>

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

The AI Problem, historical perspective bw <bwtnguy@yahoo.com> - 2019-08-25 02:40 +0200
  Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2019-08-25 03:10 +0200
    Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-08-25 03:40 +0200
      Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2019-08-25 04:10 +0200
        Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-08-25 09:20 +0200
        Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-08-25 10:10 +0200
          Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2019-08-25 14:30 +0200
            Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2019-08-25 15:30 +0200
              Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2019-08-25 15:40 +0200
                Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2019-08-25 16:50 +0200
                Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2019-08-25 17:00 +0200
                Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-08-25 17:20 +0200
                Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2019-08-25 17:00 +0200
              Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2019-08-25 16:40 +0200
  Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2019-08-25 03:30 +0200
    Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2019-08-25 03:40 +0200
      Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2019-08-25 05:00 +0200

csiph-web