Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #213224
| From | Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective |
| Date | 2019-08-25 03:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <yyPvX-8vT-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <yyOJz-7Yi-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
I dont detect a failure of vision causing the problems you mention. I detect "AI" in the service of attaining cash inflow. Second, i like what Feigenbaum said about AI some time ago. It is actually a deep remark: Every time we think we made an advance towards AI, it turns out that we only wrote a good program. On Sat, Aug 24, 2019, 7:39 PM bw <bwtnguy@yahoo.com> wrote: > If we start back at the science fiction beginning of the idea, we see that > Asimov really did not anticipate the implications of AI impersonating > human intelligence. Some of his stories did have robots/androids that > impersonated humans, but ignored the fundamentals... robots should > disclose themselves upon demand. It should be a basic law. > > This failure of vision IMO has led to many of the problems we now are > faced with, like, How to stop Robocalls? WTF do we do when the grid goes > down and the computer won't cooperate?? Why does the bank keep saying I > have three last names?, etc.. > > It's off-topic, so I alopogize. I thought some of the non-AI readers may > find it interesting. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Laws_of_Robotics > >
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The AI Problem, historical perspective bw <bwtnguy@yahoo.com> - 2019-08-25 02:40 +0200
Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2019-08-25 03:10 +0200
Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-08-25 03:40 +0200
Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2019-08-25 04:10 +0200
Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-08-25 09:20 +0200
Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-08-25 10:10 +0200
Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2019-08-25 14:30 +0200
Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2019-08-25 15:30 +0200
Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2019-08-25 15:40 +0200
Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2019-08-25 16:50 +0200
Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2019-08-25 17:00 +0200
Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-08-25 17:20 +0200
Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2019-08-25 17:00 +0200
Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2019-08-25 16:40 +0200
Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2019-08-25 03:30 +0200
Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2019-08-25 03:40 +0200
Re: The AI Problem, historical perspective Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2019-08-25 05:00 +0200
csiph-web