Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #211588
| From | Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Performance of mu in buster |
| Date | 2019-07-20 20:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ym27D-8fJ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ym1Oh-7TM-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
juh [2019-07-20T19:44:47+02] wrote: > I am very disappointed of mu in buster. In stretch I index nearly > 300.000 emails with mu. Each time I index new mails in mu4e I had to > wait 15 minutes until the indexing was complete. So I hoped that > indexing with mu 1.2 would be much faster, but instead mu eats all my > memory and indexes several hours, even for updating with new mail. > > Anyone experiencing the same? I use Notmuch which uses libxapian and libgmime, just like Mu (maildir-utils). Since the indexing and database backends are the same you could try comparing Mu and Notmuch. I have only about 35000 mails and with those Notmuch is really fast. The initial indexing takes some minutes but after that everything is fast. -- /// OpenPGP key: 4E1055DC84E9DFF613D78557719D69D324539450 // https://keys.openpgp.org/search?q=tlikonen@iki.fi / https://keybase.io/tlikonen https://github.com/tlikonen
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Performance of mu in buster juh <juh+debian@mailbox.org> - 2019-07-20 20:00 +0200 Re: Performance of mu in buster Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> - 2019-07-20 20:20 +0200 Re: Performance of mu in buster juh <juh+debian@mailbox.org> - 2019-07-20 22:10 +0200
csiph-web