Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #211588

Re: Performance of mu in buster

From Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Performance of mu in buster
Date 2019-07-20 20:20 +0200
Message-ID <ym27D-8fJ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <ym1Oh-7TM-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

juh [2019-07-20T19:44:47+02] wrote:

> I am very disappointed of mu in buster. In stretch I index nearly
> 300.000 emails with mu. Each time I index new mails in mu4e I had to
> wait 15 minutes until the indexing was complete. So I hoped that
> indexing with mu 1.2 would be much faster, but instead mu eats all my
> memory and indexes several hours, even for updating with new mail.
>
> Anyone experiencing the same?

I use Notmuch which uses libxapian and libgmime, just like Mu
(maildir-utils). Since the indexing and database backends are the same
you could try comparing Mu and Notmuch.

I have only about 35000 mails and with those Notmuch is really fast. The
initial indexing takes some minutes but after that everything is fast.

-- 
///  OpenPGP key: 4E1055DC84E9DFF613D78557719D69D324539450
//  https://keys.openpgp.org/search?q=tlikonen@iki.fi
/  https://keybase.io/tlikonen  https://github.com/tlikonen

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Performance of mu in buster juh <juh+debian@mailbox.org> - 2019-07-20 20:00 +0200
  Re: Performance of mu in buster Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> - 2019-07-20 20:20 +0200
  Re: Performance of mu in buster juh <juh+debian@mailbox.org> - 2019-07-20 22:10 +0200

csiph-web